Blog Post

Honey, I Want the House! – Division of the Marital Residence in Illinois Divorce Matters

Victoria R. Paton & Nayeli Cadenas • July 22, 2022
A man is sitting on a couch while a woman stands in front of a window.


In Illinois dissolution (divorce) proceedings, the parties’ property is either “marital” or “non-marital.” Non-marital property is property acquired prior to the marriage or acquired through gift or inheritance. All other property is marital property, regardless of which party acquired it or how it is titled. Typically, one of the biggest marital assets, and therefore one of the biggest points of contention in a dissolution, is the home the parties resided in during the marriage (the “marital residence.”)


With one house and two parties who no longer wish to live together, how do the courts decide who stays and who goes? This answer is not a simple one…but typically, there are three options. 1) Listing the marital residence for sale; 2) a buyout, and 3) awarding the marital residence to one party in dividing the marital estate. These options are explained below.*


LISTING THE MARITAL RESIDENCE FOR SALE:


This option usually occurs by agreement of the parties or by court order when the parties cannot agree on who gets to stay and who has to go, or when the parties cannot afford to maintain the home. The process begins with the mutual (or court-ordered) selection of a Realtor who determines the list price. The parties then equitably divide the costs of listing the home, any necessary repairs, Realtor commissions, and real estate attorney fees. On closing, the parties equitably divide the net proceeds from the sale.  


BUYOUT:


A buyout typically occurs when one party wants to remain in the marital residence and the other does not, or when the parties agree that it is in the best interests of the minor children that one party retain the marital residence. The Court may also order a buyout, as discussed below.

 

A buyout requires an appraisal to determine the value of the marital residence, the cost for which is typically split between the parties. If the marital residence is encumbered by a mortgage on dissolution, the party remaining in the marital residence will then refinance the home to remove the other party’s name from the loan. Following the refinance, the parties will equitably divide the equity in the marital residence (value of the marital residence as determined by the appraisal minus the mortgage balance) between them. Lastly, the party leaving the marital residence will execute a quitclaim deed, completely releasing their rights in the marital residence to the other party.


AWARDING THE MARITAL RESIDENCE TO ONE PARTY:


This last option usually comes about when the parties cannot agree on the options outlined above, or when the court does not find them appropriate. A court can order the buyout of the marital residence, as outlined above. In ordering such, the court will consider several factors - including, but not limited to:


  • Each party’s contribution to the marital residence and/or the marital estate
  • Any dissipation or wasting of marital property by a party
  • The value of the marital estate assigned to each spouse
  • The duration of the marriage
  • The relevant economic circumstances of each party
  • The custodial provisions for any children
  • Maintenance (alimony) awarded to each party
  • The tax consequences of the property division


The court may also award the marital residence to one party without requiring any sort of buyout, in consideration of any of the factors outlined above. This does not necessarily mean that the other party gets “nothing” – it simply means that they do not receive any portion of the home in the division of marital property.


If you are considering initiating dissolution proceedings in Illinois, or are involved in the same and have questions regarding the division of the marital estate, please reach out to the attorneys at Lavelle Law to assist you with your case.

 

Should you have additional questions regarding the subject matter hereinabove, please call us at 847-705-7555 or email Attorney Victoria R. Paton at vpaton@lavellelaw.com to schedule your free and confidential one-hour consultation to discuss your options.



* Please keep in mind that every dissolution matter is different, and the parties’ particular circumstances or agreements can lead to vastly different outcomes than what this article outlines.


More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

LATEST UPDATE on the Corporate Transparency Act and New Deadline for Filing BOIR
By Frank J. Portera February 20, 2025
This article will serve as another update to the ongoing Corporate Transparency Act developments. As of February 17, 2025, a federal judge in the Eastern District of Texas lifted the injunction it had ordered on January 7, 2025, in Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, 6:24-cv-00336 (E.D. Tex.), allowing the federal government to once again enforce the Corporate Transparency Act and its Beneficial Ownership Information Report requirements.
A Step-by-Step Guide to Bringing a Lawsuit in Illinois
By Sarah J. Reusché February 14, 2025
This article is the second in our Litigation 101 series. It focuses on the flip side: how to sue someone else. Suing someone is a serious decision that requires careful thought and preparation. Before pursuing legal action, it’s crucial to reflect on the issue and understand the steps involved in bringing a lawsuit. This article outlines the basics to help you approach the process with confidence and make informed decisions.
Updates Regarding the Corporate Transparency Act Hold: Key Implications for Businesses
By Frank J. Portera February 13, 2025
On December 11, 2024, we published an article titled “Corporate Transparency Act on Hold: Key Implications for Businesses,” which addressed the nationwide injunction impacting the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act and its Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting rule. Since then, there have been a few significant legal developments that businesses should monitor closely. While the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network is currently prohibited from enforcing BOIR requirements, ongoing litigation, and the related appeals may alter this status. Below, we provide a timeline of key events and insights into what business owners should anticipate moving forward.
IRS Special Payments Sent to 1 Million Taxpayers Who Did Not Claim 2021 Recovery Rebate Credit
By Timothy M. Hughes February 10, 2025
The Internal Revenue Service is issuing automatic payments to eligible people who did not claim a Recovery Rebate Credit on their 2021 tax returns. The payments are in follow up to an IRS announcement last month of the intent to take this special step. The IRS took this step after reviewing internal data showing many eligible taxpayers who filed a return but did not claim the credit. The Recovery Rebate Credit is a refundable credit for individuals who did not receive one or more Economic Impact Payments (“EIP”), also known as stimulus payments.
SCOTUS Resolves Circuit Split on FLSA Exemption Standard
By Steven A. Migala February 5, 2025
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) establishes federal minimum wage and overtime pay requirements, with exemptions for employees in bona fide executive, administrative, professional, computer or outside sales roles. 29 U.S.C. § 213. Employees classified as "outside sales" must primarily engage in making sales or obtaining contracts for services or the use of facilities, and they must conduct their work primarily away from their employer’s place of business. 29 C.F.R. § 541.500.
Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA)
By Sarah J. Reusché January 23, 2025
Amendments to BIPA SB 2929 became effective on August 2, 2024. Codified as 740 ILCS 14/10 and 14/20, this Act introduced two pivotal changes to BIPA that dealers should be aware of: • Limiting Per-Scan Damages: The amendments clarify that a single violation under BIPA accrues per type of violation, rather than per scan. This significantly reduces the financial exposure for dealerships. • Electronic Consent: The amendments formalize electronic signatures as a valid means of securing biometric consent, streamlining compliance processes for businesses.
IRS National Taxpayer Advocate Releases Annual Report to Congress. And in an Unrelated Matter DOJ Ta
By Timothy M. Hughes January 10, 2025
The National Taxpayer Advocate recently released her annual report to Congress. A few highlights from the report are summarized in this article.
Nearly 300 New Illinois Laws are going into effect in 2025.
By Lavelle Law January 8, 2025
Nearly 300 New Illinois Laws are going into effect in 2025. Listed below are some that may have a significant impact on you or your business.
Happy New Year and Cheers to New Adventures in 2025!
By Lavelle Law December 31, 2024
As we say farewell to 2024, we’re excited to look back on the unforgettable moments from our Koozie Challenge! From the frozen wonders of Antarctica to the excitement of the Paris Olympics, and countless incredible destinations in between, the Lavelle Law koozie truly went the distance this year! A big thank you to our clients, staff, family, and friends who took part in the fun. Here’s to even more adventures in 2025! Happy New Year from Lavelle Law!
Lavelle Law concludes the 2024 annual food drive.
By Lavelle Law December 30, 2024
Schaumburg-based Lavelle Law wrapped its annual food drive benefiting the Schaumburg Township Food Pantry. During the month of October, Lavelle Law set up collection boxes around Schaumburg and the surrounding area, where residents and workers could drop off nonperishable food items, paper goods, personal care items, baby food and diapers. Participants could also make cash donations online.
More Posts
Share by: