Background
A Type F reorganization (“F Reorg”), governed by Section 368(a)(1)(F) of the Internal Revenue Code, provides a strategically significant mechanism for corporate restructuring. Defined as a “mere change in identity, form, or place of organization of one corporation,” an F Reorg permits a corporation to alter its legal existence while being treated for federal tax purposes as the same entity. This recharacterization allows for the uninterrupted preservation of tax attributes while maintaining shareholder continuity.
The Internal Revenue Service, through Treasury Regulation §1.368-2(m), has articulated six criteria to qualify as an F Reorg, including:
Strategic Benefits
F Reorgs can be used as preparatory vehicles in transactional and tax structuring. One of the principal benefits is that the reorganization is generally tax-deferred—there is no recognition of gain or loss, and the tax attributes are carried forward to the resulting entity. This tax continuity makes the structure ideal for effectuating legal changes without triggering tax consequences.
Additionally, an F Reorg offers flexibility when repositioning a corporate structure in anticipation of a financing event or exit. It is commonly used to insert a holding company atop an existing operating company, thereby facilitating venture capital investment or an acquisition while preserving the operating entity’s history and status. The structure is also beneficial in circumstances where a corporation seeks to change its jurisdiction of incorporation.
In the context of a target S corporation, the F Reorg is particularly useful. It allows for the target to first convert to a qualified subchapter S subsidiary (“QSub”) and then to become a single-member LLC. It can also be a critical tool in estate planning, allowing shareholders to reorganize equity holdings under new trusts or vehicles without interrupting the business’s operational or tax continuity.
Possible Disadvantages
Despite the advantages, F Reorgs are not without complexity or risk. The transaction must be structured with precision to ensure compliance with the regulatory criteria. Failure to meet any of the six IRS requirements may result in the loss of tax-free treatment and the imposition of corporate and shareholder-level tax on what would otherwise be a non-recognition transaction.
The structure also imposes certain limitations. Because the resulting corporation must not possess any assets or tax attributes prior to the transaction—other than a de minimis amount required for legal existence—care must be taken to ensure proper formation and sequencing. Furthermore, while the transferor must completely liquidate for tax purposes, it may not be legally dissolved under state law, potentially creating ongoing administrative burdens.
Types of Transactions where an F Reorg is Useful
Taking into account the strategic benefits detailed above, below are examples of where F Reorgs can be a useful planning technique to accomplish tax planning goals:
Conclusion
For corporations navigating sophisticated transactions—whether preparing for a capital raise, acquisition, state re-domiciliation, or intergenerational ownership transfer—a Type F Reorg offers a means of achieving structural change while preserving tax continuity and operational identity. While the F reorganization does not lend itself to every scenario, in the right context, it can unlock significant advantages, including tax deferral, investor alignment, and streamlined legal compliance. For further inquiries or questions, please contact Steven Migala at smigala@lavellelaw.com or (847) 705-7555.
STAY UP TO DATE
Lavelle Law, Ltd. | All Rights Reserved |
Created by Olive + Ash.
Managed by Olive Street Design.