Blog Post

Banking and Business Monthly – March 2024

Steven A. Migala • Mar 12, 2024

The CFPB’s New Rule Regulating Credit Card Late Fees

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) announced a regulatory amendment on March 5, 2024, targeting credit card late fees, a significant move poised to alter the financial landscape for both consumers and credit card issuers. Under this new rule, the maximum allowable late fee chargeable by large credit card issuers is significantly reduced to $8. This decision follows a proposal released in March 2023 and will take effect 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.


Who Does this Rule Apply to?


The rule differentiates between credit card issuers based on the size of their account holdings, specifically targeting large issuers while providing exemptions for smaller issuers. Entities with one million or more open accounts are the primary subjects of the new regulations. The CFFB estimates this group includes the largest 30 to 35 credit card issuers, which accounts for more than 95% of the credit card market’s total outstanding balances.


In contrast, issuers with fewer than one million open accounts are not subject to the $8 cap. The CFPB has indicated that applying the rule to these smaller entities would impose a disproportionate compliance burden. Smaller card issuers may still charge a higher safe harbor threshold for credit card late fees and automatically increase the safe harbor dollar amount based on the Consumer Price Index.


Key Provisions & Requirements


Reduction of Safe Harbor Late Fees: The rule substantially reduces the safe harbor late fee from the existing amounts of up to $30 for the first violation and $41 for subsequent violations within six billing cycles. The new amount is $8 for late payments, applicable to all subsequent late payment violations occurring within six months of the initial violation.


Requirement for Cost Analysis: For larger card issuers wishing to charge late fees above the $8 threshold, the rule mandates a rigorous cost analysis to demonstrate that such fees are necessary to cover the actual costs incurred from late payments. The rule clarifies that costs related to post-charge-off collections cannot be included in this analysis.


Inflation Adjustment Limitations: The rule modifies the approach to annual inflation adjustments for late fee safe harbor amounts. Unlike previous practices that allowed for automatic annual adjustments based on inflation, the CFPB will now monitor the market and make adjustments to the safe harbor amount as deemed necessary.


Rate and Fee Increases and Management Tools: The rule also acknowledges that issuers can deter late payments and manage associated risks through other means, such as increasing interest rates, raising annual and monthly fees, and adjusting credit lines. However, the rule stipulates that larger card issuers considering adjustments to their APRs must conduct a rate reevaluation under Section 1026.59 of Regulation Z.


Charges Up to Amount of Required Minimum Payment: The rule maintains the provision that allows card issuers to charge late fees up to the full amount of the required minimum payment due, provided such fees comply with the cost-analysis requirements established by Regulation Z.


Exclusion of Courtesy Period: The CFPB considered including a 15-day courtesy period requirement before a late fee could be assessed. However, the final rule did not implement any courtesy period for late fees. The CFPB indicated the potential benefits were outweighed by the burden it could cause regarding customer confusion.


What’s Next for Large Credit Card Issuers?


Policy Assessment and Adjustment: Large credit card issuers should conduct a thorough review of their current late fee policies to ensure alignment with the new rule, including evaluating whether to adopt the $8 safe harbor for late fees or undertake a detailed cost analysis.


Cost Analysis for Higher Fees: For issuers considering fees above the $8 limit, a comprehensive cost analysis becomes imperative. This analysis must demonstrate that the higher fees are necessary to cover the specific costs associated with the late payments, excluding post-charge-off collection costs.


Disclosure and Communication Updates: The new late fee provisions necessitate updates to a range of customer communications and disclosures. This includes changes to account-opening disclosures, periodic statements, and advertising materials to reflect the revised fee structure. Issuers will need to ensure that all relevant disclosures are clear, accurate, and in compliance with the requirements of Regulation Z.


The expertise and guidance of legal professionals can be useful in navigating the complexities of the CFPB's new rule on credit card late fees. For further inquiries or questions, please contact me at smigala@lavellelaw.com or at (847) 705-7555. Thanks go to Nathan Toy for his assistance with this month’s article.


More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

An essential part of a good contract is often overlooked. Learn about fee shifting provisions.
By Joseph O. Upchurch and MaryAllison Mahacek 23 Apr, 2024
Between the state of Illinois and federal courts, there are well over 200 statutes that deal with fee shifting provisions. They lay out ways in which legal fees may become the responsibility of one party in a lawsuit. In this video, Lavelle Law Associates Jodie Upchurch and MaryAllison Mahacek discuss ways that these provisions should be included in contracts and how they can be used advantageously.
Great advice on what to expect on your final walkthrough.
By Chance W. Badertscher 22 Apr, 2024
Lavelle Law real estate attorney, Chance Badertscher, recently participated in a Straight Up Chicago Investor Podcast and shared his expertise on what to expect on the final walkthrough before your real estate closing. He breaks it down and shares tips for both the buyer and the seller.
An essential part of a good contract is often overlooked. Learn about fee shifting provisions.
By Joseph O. Upchurch and MaryAllison Mahacek 18 Apr, 2024
Between the state of Illinois and federal courts, there are well over 200 statutes which deal with fee shifting provisions. They lay out ways in which legal fees may become the responsibility of one party in a lawsuit. Lavelle Law Associates Jodie Upchurch and MaryAllison Mahacek discuss ways that these provisions should be included in contracts and how they can be used advantageously.
Emergency Estate Tax Savings - a Lavelle Law Success Story
By Estate Planning and Administration 16 Apr, 2024
Our team worked very quickly (in a matter of just a few days) to establish temporary guardianship of the client, and – most importantly – successfully argued for the judge to authorize the guardian to execute and finalize the estate plan documents on the client’s behalf. Finalizing the estate planning documents in advance of the client’s death saved the estate and the client’s family nearly $500,000 in estate taxes.
Watch this video if you are considering setting up a medical spa in Illinois.
By Eso H. Akunne 12 Apr, 2024
Businesses classified as medical spas have a variety of special considerations that must be adhered to in the state of Illinois. In this video, Lavelle Law attorney Eso Akunne discusses critical issues that must be met to operate with state laws. If you are interested in getting involved in this rapidly growing industry be sure to watch this video.
Time to Claim a Refund Expires on May 17, 2024 Deadline, Then $1 Billion in Refunds Will be Lost.
By Timothy M. Hughes 10 Apr, 2024
The IRS recently announced that almost 940,000 people across the nation have unclaimed refunds for tax year 2020 but face a May 17 deadline to submit their tax returns. The IRS estimates more than $1 billion in refunds remain unclaimed because people have not filed their 2020 tax returns yet. The average median refund is $932 for 2020. The IRS estimates that about 36,200 Illinois taxpayers may lose $40,608,000 in potential refunds.
Lavelle Law was named to the Illinois College of Law Honor Roll.
By News 09 Apr, 2024
Lavelle Law was named to the Illinois College of Law Honor Roll.
Delaware Chancery Court Nullifies Common Stockholder Agreement Terms
By Steven A. Migala 09 Apr, 2024
In a significant ruling by the Delaware Court of Chancery, specific terms within a stockholder agreement were invalidated. Presided over by Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster, the case of West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. Moelis & Co., No. 2023-0309-JTL (Del. Ch. Feb. 23, 2024), scrutinized the limitations imposed on the board of directors’ authority by a stockholder agreement under the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”). This decision challenges the conventional structuring of stockholder agreements involving a controlling stockholder.
Major life events, shifts in financial status, and changes in the law can affect your estate plan.
By Heather A. McCollum and Gabriel Kokoszka 26 Mar, 2024
Spring has sprung! Earlier than we’re used to, maybe, and with some backsliding into the unexpectedly frigid March days here and there, but sprung nonetheless! This spring, the cleaning you need to worry about most might not be finally scrubbing down those gross shower tiles: you may need to worry about keeping your estate plan fresh. This is because, contrary to what many assume, creating an estate plan is *not* a “one-and-done” legal activity. Major life events, shifts in financial status, and changes in the applicable law can all affect your estate plan, and those changes may require you to make some edits to your documents. So, this spring, dust off your estate plan and consider the following:
Listen to this podcast if you are considering setting up a medical spa in Illinois.
By Eso H. Akunne 25 Mar, 2024
Businesses classified as medical spas have a variety of special considerations that must be adhered to in the state of Illinois. In this discussion, Lavelle Law attorney Eso Akunne discusses critical issues that must be met to operate with state laws.
More Posts
Share by: