Blog Post

You Can Go Your Own Way—Once a Judge Weighs In

Annette K. Corrigan • June 27, 2023

Illinois’ Relocation Requirements for Parents of Minors

A woman is helping a little girl with her homework.

Americans relocate for many reasons, ranging from family obligations to the pursuit of exciting new career opportunities. Especially with the rise of “work-from-home” jobs, more people than ever are feeling empowered to make big moves in pursuit of, among other things, pleasant weather, family proximity, or increased quality of life. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, nearly 7.9 million people moved between states in 2021, up from almost 7.4 million in 2019 and this increase does not take into account moves from city to city within the same state.



As exciting as a fresh start can be, there is no doubt that a residential move is always stressful, inherently involving meticulous planning and logistics. If you couple that with child custody considerations in the State of Illinois, it would be wise to make sure that this meticulous planning involves consulting with an attorney—or you may run the risk of violating the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (“IMDMA”).


Under the IMDMA, the distribution of parenting time may be modified at any time upon a showing of “changed circumstances that necessitates modification to serve the best interests of the child”. (750 ILCS 5/610.5) The Act states clearly that a relocation by a parent constitutes changed circumstances. (750 ILCS 5/609.2) Despite its name, the Act applies to any parent with allocated parenting time of a minor child, not just divorced couples.


What does it mean to “relocate”? It does not only mean a move out-of-state. The Act defines “relocation” as any move involving:


  1. A change of residence from the child’s current primary residence located in the county of Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, or Will to a new residence within this State that is more than 25 miles from the child’s current residence, as measured by an Internet mapping service;
  2. A change of residence from the child’s current primary residence located in a county not listed in paragraph (1) to a new residence within this State that is more than 50 miles from the child’s current primary residence, as measured by an Internet mapping service; or
  3. A change of residence from the child’s current primary residence to a residence outside the borders of this State that is more than 25 miles from the current primary residence, as measured by an Internet mapping service.


750 ILCS 5/600. 


If you think your upcoming move is going to fall into one of the three categories listed, then your parenting time agreement is subject to modification due to these changed circumstances. This then means that if you are a parent with full or equal parenting time under your parenting agreement seeking to relocate with your child, you are required by law to provide written notice (sent to the other parent, AND filed with the court) notifying them that you intend to relocate. 750 ILCS 5/609.2. You are to include in the notice the date of your move, where exactly you are moving to, and for how long. Id.


If your co-parent consents to the relocation, the two of you will draw up an updated parenting plan for the court, easy as can be. However, if your co-parent refuses to consent, you will be obligated to file a petition with the court seeking the judge’s permission to relocate with your child. Id.


As part of the process, you and your lawyer will need to explain why this relocation is in the “best interest of the child,” which is the enduring legal standard for determining issues of parental allocation and child welfare. The Act directs judges who are confronted with relocation to consider eleven different factors:


  1. The circumstances and reasons for the intended relocation;
  2. The reasons, if any, why a parent is objecting to the intended relocation;
  3. The history and quality of each parent’s relationship with the child and specifically whether a parent has substantially failed or refused to exercise the parental responsibilities allocated to him or her under the parenting plan or allocation judgment;
  4. The educational opportunities for the child at the existing location and at the proposed new location;
  5. The presence or absence of extended family at the existing location and at the proposed new location;
  6. The anticipated impact of the relocation on the child;
  7. Whether the court will be able to fashion a reasonable allocation of parental responsibilities between all parents if the relocation occurs;
  8. The wishes of the child, taking into account the child’s maturity and ability to express reasoned and independent preferences as to relocation;
  9. Possible arrangements for the exercise of parental responsibilities appropriate to the parents’ resources and circumstances and the developmental level of the child;
  10. Minimization of the impairment to a parent-child relationship caused by a parent’s relocation; and
  11. Any other relevant factors bearing on the child’s best interests.


750 ILCS 5/609.2


When representing you in this type of dispute, I would sit down with you and develop a plan to explain why your circumstances weigh towards a relocation being the best thing for your child. Courts are mindful that the consideration of a unique child's best interest cannot be reduced to a simple bright-line test, and the special case-by-case circumstances of each individual family will always be considered. Siegel v. Siegel, 2021 IL App (5th) 210197-U, ¶ 64.


It is essential that you work to follow the letter of the law in the delicate area of co-parenting disputes; understandably, judges often look harshly upon parents who move their child unannounced, without giving formal notice to their co-parent and the court. Remember, your co-parent has rights too.


If you (or your co-parent) are considering a big move and you have questions regarding your allocation of parenting time, your rights under your unique parenting arrangement, or other topics relating to family law, please reach out to the attorneys at Lavelle Law at 847-705-7555, or email Attorney Annette Corrigan at acorrigan@lavellelaw.com to schedule your free and confidential consultation to discuss your options.


More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

FinCEN Eliminates BOI Reporting Obligations!
By Frank P. Portera March 25, 2025
On March 21, 2025, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued its interim final rule stating that those entities previously classified as "domestic reporting companies" are now exempt from all BOI reporting requirements. On the other hand, all foreign entities registered to do business in the USA must file their own initial BOI reports within 30 days of the initial final rule's publication, if they have not done so already.
Join us April 3, 2025 for Business After Hours 5-7 PM
By Lavelle Law March 19, 2025
Spring is here, and with baseball season kicking off, we’re stepping up to the plate with our annual Lavelle Law Business After Hours event. We’re excited to partner with our friends in the Schaumburg business community for an evening of networking, good vibes, and a few surprises—all hosted in the friendly confines of our Schaumburg office. Bonus points: Feel free to rock your favorite baseball team’s gear and show off your fandom while you’re at it!
Delaware Court  Provides the Standard of Supreme Review for the Redomestication of Corporations
By Steven A. Migala and Anthony Letto March 12, 2025
Delaware corporations seeking to redomesticate to another state should be advised that on February 4, 2025, the Delaware Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Palkon v. Maffei, C.A. No. 2023-0449-JTL, addressing a challenge to TripAdvisor's redomestication from a Delaware corporation to a Nevada corporation. The case raised important questions regarding the standard of review applicable to such reincorporations, particularly when fiduciaries may derive a benefit from shifting to a legal regime perceived as more friendly.
Illinois residential zoning laws and significant opportunities for property owners.
By Chance W. Badertscher March 12, 2025
Recent legislative efforts in Illinois are reshaping the state’s approach to residential zoning, with significant implications for the housing market. A new bill, House Bill 1814, introduced last week, aims to eliminate single-family zoning in municipalities across Illinois. If passed, this bill will allow for the development of multi-unit buildings in areas currently zoned exclusively for single-family homes. This initiative, alongside a similar bill introduced last year, has the potential to address the state’s growing housing shortage and make housing more affordable for middle-class families.
LATEST UPDATE on the Corporate Transparency Act and BOI Report Filings
By Frank J. Portera and James Berg March 11, 2025
On February 27, 2025, FinCEN issued an immediate press release stating it would not impose fines, penalties, or take any other enforcement actions against companies that fail to file or update Beneficial Ownership Information ("BOI") reports pursuant to the Corporate Transparency Act ("CTA") by the current deadlines. FinCEN also announced that it would be revising BOI reporting deadlines through an interim final rule set to be issued no later than March 21, 2025.
IRS Releases its List of Dirty Dozen Tax Scams for 2025
By Timothy M. Hughes March 10, 2025
The IRS recently published its yearly list of most prevalent tax scams known as its Dirty Dozen. The list is obviously not exhaustive but an attempt to warn taxpayers of trends seen by the IRS. The IRS list of tax scams for 2025 came with a warning for taxpayers, businesses, and tax professionals to watch out for common schemes that threaten their tax and financial information.
Success Story – Small Business Owner Recovers Substantial Amount Levied by the State
By Tax Law March 5, 2025
Lavelle Law represented a small Illinois business owner who had accumulated a large sales tax balance due to their accountant’s negligence. Unbeknownst to the client Illinois Department of Revenue (“IDOR”) was at the levy issuance phase in its collection. And the IDOR levied the taxpayer’s account right after the taxpayer had deposited funds from a HELOC that was obtained to provide capital to the company for the next 6 plus months.
New statutory provisions on potential income included in new Illinois child support law.
By Joseph A. Olszowka February 27, 2025
The Illinois legislature has recently taken a significant step in closing a longstanding loophole in child support. This amendment represents a pivotal change in how courts assess and calculate child support obligations, providing greater protections against those who attempt to evade their financial responsibilities.
LATEST UPDATE on the Corporate Transparency Act and New Deadline for Filing BOIR
By Frank J. Portera February 20, 2025
This article will serve as another update to the ongoing Corporate Transparency Act developments. As of February 17, 2025, a federal judge in the Eastern District of Texas lifted the injunction it had ordered on January 7, 2025, in Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, 6:24-cv-00336 (E.D. Tex.), allowing the federal government to once again enforce the Corporate Transparency Act and its Beneficial Ownership Information Report requirements.
A Step-by-Step Guide to Bringing a Lawsuit in Illinois
By Sarah J. Reusché February 14, 2025
This article is the second in our Litigation 101 series. It focuses on the flip side: how to sue someone else. Suing someone is a serious decision that requires careful thought and preparation. Before pursuing legal action, it’s crucial to reflect on the issue and understand the steps involved in bringing a lawsuit. This article outlines the basics to help you approach the process with confidence and make informed decisions.
More Posts
Share by: