Blog Post

You Can Go Your Own Way—Once a Judge Weighs In

Annette K. Corrigan • June 27, 2023

Illinois’ Relocation Requirements for Parents of Minors

A woman is helping a little girl with her homework.

Americans relocate for many reasons, ranging from family obligations to the pursuit of exciting new career opportunities. Especially with the rise of “work-from-home” jobs, more people than ever are feeling empowered to make big moves in pursuit of, among other things, pleasant weather, family proximity, or increased quality of life. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, nearly 7.9 million people moved between states in 2021, up from almost 7.4 million in 2019 and this increase does not take into account moves from city to city within the same state.



As exciting as a fresh start can be, there is no doubt that a residential move is always stressful, inherently involving meticulous planning and logistics. If you couple that with child custody considerations in the State of Illinois, it would be wise to make sure that this meticulous planning involves consulting with an attorney—or you may run the risk of violating the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (“IMDMA”).


Under the IMDMA, the distribution of parenting time may be modified at any time upon a showing of “changed circumstances that necessitates modification to serve the best interests of the child”. (750 ILCS 5/610.5) The Act states clearly that a relocation by a parent constitutes changed circumstances. (750 ILCS 5/609.2) Despite its name, the Act applies to any parent with allocated parenting time of a minor child, not just divorced couples.


What does it mean to “relocate”? It does not only mean a move out-of-state. The Act defines “relocation” as any move involving:


  1. A change of residence from the child’s current primary residence located in the county of Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, or Will to a new residence within this State that is more than 25 miles from the child’s current residence, as measured by an Internet mapping service;
  2. A change of residence from the child’s current primary residence located in a county not listed in paragraph (1) to a new residence within this State that is more than 50 miles from the child’s current primary residence, as measured by an Internet mapping service; or
  3. A change of residence from the child’s current primary residence to a residence outside the borders of this State that is more than 25 miles from the current primary residence, as measured by an Internet mapping service.


750 ILCS 5/600. 


If you think your upcoming move is going to fall into one of the three categories listed, then your parenting time agreement is subject to modification due to these changed circumstances. This then means that if you are a parent with full or equal parenting time under your parenting agreement seeking to relocate with your child, you are required by law to provide written notice (sent to the other parent, AND filed with the court) notifying them that you intend to relocate. 750 ILCS 5/609.2. You are to include in the notice the date of your move, where exactly you are moving to, and for how long. Id.


If your co-parent consents to the relocation, the two of you will draw up an updated parenting plan for the court, easy as can be. However, if your co-parent refuses to consent, you will be obligated to file a petition with the court seeking the judge’s permission to relocate with your child. Id.


As part of the process, you and your lawyer will need to explain why this relocation is in the “best interest of the child,” which is the enduring legal standard for determining issues of parental allocation and child welfare. The Act directs judges who are confronted with relocation to consider eleven different factors:


  1. The circumstances and reasons for the intended relocation;
  2. The reasons, if any, why a parent is objecting to the intended relocation;
  3. The history and quality of each parent’s relationship with the child and specifically whether a parent has substantially failed or refused to exercise the parental responsibilities allocated to him or her under the parenting plan or allocation judgment;
  4. The educational opportunities for the child at the existing location and at the proposed new location;
  5. The presence or absence of extended family at the existing location and at the proposed new location;
  6. The anticipated impact of the relocation on the child;
  7. Whether the court will be able to fashion a reasonable allocation of parental responsibilities between all parents if the relocation occurs;
  8. The wishes of the child, taking into account the child’s maturity and ability to express reasoned and independent preferences as to relocation;
  9. Possible arrangements for the exercise of parental responsibilities appropriate to the parents’ resources and circumstances and the developmental level of the child;
  10. Minimization of the impairment to a parent-child relationship caused by a parent’s relocation; and
  11. Any other relevant factors bearing on the child’s best interests.


750 ILCS 5/609.2


When representing you in this type of dispute, I would sit down with you and develop a plan to explain why your circumstances weigh towards a relocation being the best thing for your child. Courts are mindful that the consideration of a unique child's best interest cannot be reduced to a simple bright-line test, and the special case-by-case circumstances of each individual family will always be considered. Siegel v. Siegel, 2021 IL App (5th) 210197-U, ¶ 64.


It is essential that you work to follow the letter of the law in the delicate area of co-parenting disputes; understandably, judges often look harshly upon parents who move their child unannounced, without giving formal notice to their co-parent and the court. Remember, your co-parent has rights too.


If you (or your co-parent) are considering a big move and you have questions regarding your allocation of parenting time, your rights under your unique parenting arrangement, or other topics relating to family law, please reach out to the attorneys at Lavelle Law at 847-705-7555, or email Attorney Annette Corrigan at acorrigan@lavellelaw.com to schedule your free and confidential consultation to discuss your options.


More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

LATEST UPDATE on the Corporate Transparency Act and New Deadline for Filing BOIR
By Frank J. Portera February 20, 2025
This article will serve as another update to the ongoing Corporate Transparency Act developments. As of February 17, 2025, a federal judge in the Eastern District of Texas lifted the injunction it had ordered on January 7, 2025, in Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, 6:24-cv-00336 (E.D. Tex.), allowing the federal government to once again enforce the Corporate Transparency Act and its Beneficial Ownership Information Report requirements.
A Step-by-Step Guide to Bringing a Lawsuit in Illinois
By Sarah J. Reusché February 14, 2025
This article is the second in our Litigation 101 series. It focuses on the flip side: how to sue someone else. Suing someone is a serious decision that requires careful thought and preparation. Before pursuing legal action, it’s crucial to reflect on the issue and understand the steps involved in bringing a lawsuit. This article outlines the basics to help you approach the process with confidence and make informed decisions.
Updates Regarding the Corporate Transparency Act Hold: Key Implications for Businesses
By Frank J. Portera February 13, 2025
On December 11, 2024, we published an article titled “Corporate Transparency Act on Hold: Key Implications for Businesses,” which addressed the nationwide injunction impacting the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act and its Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting rule. Since then, there have been a few significant legal developments that businesses should monitor closely. While the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network is currently prohibited from enforcing BOIR requirements, ongoing litigation, and the related appeals may alter this status. Below, we provide a timeline of key events and insights into what business owners should anticipate moving forward.
IRS Special Payments Sent to 1 Million Taxpayers Who Did Not Claim 2021 Recovery Rebate Credit
By Timothy M. Hughes February 10, 2025
The Internal Revenue Service is issuing automatic payments to eligible people who did not claim a Recovery Rebate Credit on their 2021 tax returns. The payments are in follow up to an IRS announcement last month of the intent to take this special step. The IRS took this step after reviewing internal data showing many eligible taxpayers who filed a return but did not claim the credit. The Recovery Rebate Credit is a refundable credit for individuals who did not receive one or more Economic Impact Payments (“EIP”), also known as stimulus payments.
SCOTUS Resolves Circuit Split on FLSA Exemption Standard
By Steven A. Migala February 5, 2025
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) establishes federal minimum wage and overtime pay requirements, with exemptions for employees in bona fide executive, administrative, professional, computer or outside sales roles. 29 U.S.C. § 213. Employees classified as "outside sales" must primarily engage in making sales or obtaining contracts for services or the use of facilities, and they must conduct their work primarily away from their employer’s place of business. 29 C.F.R. § 541.500.
Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA)
By Sarah J. Reusché January 23, 2025
Amendments to BIPA SB 2929 became effective on August 2, 2024. Codified as 740 ILCS 14/10 and 14/20, this Act introduced two pivotal changes to BIPA that dealers should be aware of: • Limiting Per-Scan Damages: The amendments clarify that a single violation under BIPA accrues per type of violation, rather than per scan. This significantly reduces the financial exposure for dealerships. • Electronic Consent: The amendments formalize electronic signatures as a valid means of securing biometric consent, streamlining compliance processes for businesses.
IRS National Taxpayer Advocate Releases Annual Report to Congress. And in an Unrelated Matter DOJ Ta
By Timothy M. Hughes January 10, 2025
The National Taxpayer Advocate recently released her annual report to Congress. A few highlights from the report are summarized in this article.
Nearly 300 New Illinois Laws are going into effect in 2025.
By Lavelle Law January 8, 2025
Nearly 300 New Illinois Laws are going into effect in 2025. Listed below are some that may have a significant impact on you or your business.
Happy New Year and Cheers to New Adventures in 2025!
By Lavelle Law December 31, 2024
As we say farewell to 2024, we’re excited to look back on the unforgettable moments from our Koozie Challenge! From the frozen wonders of Antarctica to the excitement of the Paris Olympics, and countless incredible destinations in between, the Lavelle Law koozie truly went the distance this year! A big thank you to our clients, staff, family, and friends who took part in the fun. Here’s to even more adventures in 2025! Happy New Year from Lavelle Law!
Lavelle Law concludes the 2024 annual food drive.
By Lavelle Law December 30, 2024
Schaumburg-based Lavelle Law wrapped its annual food drive benefiting the Schaumburg Township Food Pantry. During the month of October, Lavelle Law set up collection boxes around Schaumburg and the surrounding area, where residents and workers could drop off nonperishable food items, paper goods, personal care items, baby food and diapers. Participants could also make cash donations online.
More Posts
Share by: