Blog Post

Pending Legislation to Limit Government Action on Forfeiture

Kerry M. Lavelle and Nataly Rodriguez • June 18, 2019

The U.S. Senate has voted to limit the ability of the Internal Revenue Service to confiscate cash from small-business owners suspected of “structuring transactions (1) ,” and keep the cash without ever filing criminal charges. The Clyde-Hirsch-Sowers RESPECT Act would restrict forfeiture for currency “structuring” only when the funds in question are derived from an illegal source or used to conceal illegal activity. It also would let property owners challenge a seizure at a prompt, post-seizure hearing. Previously, property owners targeted for structuring had to wait months or even years to present their case to a judge.

What is Forfeiture?

Forfeiture is generally defined as the taking of property by the government without compensation when taxpayers have allegedly not complied with a legal obligation or for the commission of a crime. For example, a lease contract may have a forfeiture clause that gives the lessor the right to cancel the lease and reenter the property—with statutory process— if the lessee fails to pay rent. In the context of government action, Congress and state legislatures maintain statutes that allow law enforcement to seize property on suspicion of certain criminal activity. In civil forfeiture cases, the owner of the property doesn’t even need to be guilty of a crime: the proceedings charge the property itself with involvement in, or the results of a crime.

Structuring Transactions

Structuring transactions, also known as smurfing , is the practice commonly associated with money laundering, fraud, and other financial crimes. They are called “ structuring transactions ” because the transactions follow a specific structured pattern to avoid triggering any red flags by banking institutions (2) , or to avoid having to file a currency transaction report, i.e. a form 8300, with the IRS (3) .

The bill is named partly for Institute for Justice clients Jeff Hirsch and Randy Sowers, two small-business owners who had their bank accounts seized by the IRS for alleged structuring. Through structuring laws, the IRS has routinely confiscated cash from small-business owners because they frequently deposited or withdrew cash in amounts under $10,000 which appears to be intentionally “structured” to avoid the F-8300 filing. Under current civil forfeiture laws, the IRS could then keep the money without ever filing criminal charges against the individuals.

How the Proposed Legislation Would Limit the IRS

Under the proposed legislation, within 30 days of seizing the property, the IRS must (a) make a good faith effort to find all owners of the property, and (b) notify the owners of the post-seizure hearing rights established by the bill. If the owner requests a court hearing within 30 days after notice is provided, the property must be returned unless the court holds a hearing within 30 days after notice is provided and finds one of the following apply:


  • that there is probable cause to believe that the property was derived from an illegal source; or
  • the funds were structured to conceal the violation of a criminal law; or
  • criminal conduct other than a structuring violation.

For any further discussion on civil forfeiture or the potential impact from this proposed legislation on your business, please reach out to Kerry Lavelle at klavelle@lavellelaw.com to schedule an appointment.



(1) H.R.1219 - Restraining Excessive Seizure of Property through the Exploitation of Civil Asset Forfeiture Tools Act

(2) The Bank Secrecy Act of 1970 (BSA) requires financial institutions in the United States to assist U.S. government agencies in detecting and preventing money laundering by keeping records of cash purchases of negotiable instruments, filing reports if the daily aggregate exceeds $10,000, and reporting other suspicious activity.

(3) I.R.C. §6050I requires that any person engaged in a trade or business that receives cash in excess of $10,000 in a single transaction or in related transactions must file Form 8300, Report of Cash Payments Over $10,000 Received in a Trade or Business

More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

LATEST UPDATE on the Corporate Transparency Act and New Deadline for Filing BOIR
By Frank J. Portera February 20, 2025
This article will serve as another update to the ongoing Corporate Transparency Act developments. As of February 17, 2025, a federal judge in the Eastern District of Texas lifted the injunction it had ordered on January 7, 2025, in Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, 6:24-cv-00336 (E.D. Tex.), allowing the federal government to once again enforce the Corporate Transparency Act and its Beneficial Ownership Information Report requirements.
A Step-by-Step Guide to Bringing a Lawsuit in Illinois
By Sarah J. Reusché February 14, 2025
This article is the second in our Litigation 101 series. It focuses on the flip side: how to sue someone else. Suing someone is a serious decision that requires careful thought and preparation. Before pursuing legal action, it’s crucial to reflect on the issue and understand the steps involved in bringing a lawsuit. This article outlines the basics to help you approach the process with confidence and make informed decisions.
Updates Regarding the Corporate Transparency Act Hold: Key Implications for Businesses
By Frank J. Portera February 13, 2025
On December 11, 2024, we published an article titled “Corporate Transparency Act on Hold: Key Implications for Businesses,” which addressed the nationwide injunction impacting the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act and its Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting rule. Since then, there have been a few significant legal developments that businesses should monitor closely. While the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network is currently prohibited from enforcing BOIR requirements, ongoing litigation, and the related appeals may alter this status. Below, we provide a timeline of key events and insights into what business owners should anticipate moving forward.
IRS Special Payments Sent to 1 Million Taxpayers Who Did Not Claim 2021 Recovery Rebate Credit
By Timothy M. Hughes February 10, 2025
The Internal Revenue Service is issuing automatic payments to eligible people who did not claim a Recovery Rebate Credit on their 2021 tax returns. The payments are in follow up to an IRS announcement last month of the intent to take this special step. The IRS took this step after reviewing internal data showing many eligible taxpayers who filed a return but did not claim the credit. The Recovery Rebate Credit is a refundable credit for individuals who did not receive one or more Economic Impact Payments (“EIP”), also known as stimulus payments.
SCOTUS Resolves Circuit Split on FLSA Exemption Standard
By Steven A. Migala February 5, 2025
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) establishes federal minimum wage and overtime pay requirements, with exemptions for employees in bona fide executive, administrative, professional, computer or outside sales roles. 29 U.S.C. § 213. Employees classified as "outside sales" must primarily engage in making sales or obtaining contracts for services or the use of facilities, and they must conduct their work primarily away from their employer’s place of business. 29 C.F.R. § 541.500.
Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA)
By Sarah J. Reusché January 23, 2025
Amendments to BIPA SB 2929 became effective on August 2, 2024. Codified as 740 ILCS 14/10 and 14/20, this Act introduced two pivotal changes to BIPA that dealers should be aware of: • Limiting Per-Scan Damages: The amendments clarify that a single violation under BIPA accrues per type of violation, rather than per scan. This significantly reduces the financial exposure for dealerships. • Electronic Consent: The amendments formalize electronic signatures as a valid means of securing biometric consent, streamlining compliance processes for businesses.
IRS National Taxpayer Advocate Releases Annual Report to Congress. And in an Unrelated Matter DOJ Ta
By Timothy M. Hughes January 10, 2025
The National Taxpayer Advocate recently released her annual report to Congress. A few highlights from the report are summarized in this article.
Nearly 300 New Illinois Laws are going into effect in 2025.
By Lavelle Law January 8, 2025
Nearly 300 New Illinois Laws are going into effect in 2025. Listed below are some that may have a significant impact on you or your business.
Happy New Year and Cheers to New Adventures in 2025!
By Lavelle Law December 31, 2024
As we say farewell to 2024, we’re excited to look back on the unforgettable moments from our Koozie Challenge! From the frozen wonders of Antarctica to the excitement of the Paris Olympics, and countless incredible destinations in between, the Lavelle Law koozie truly went the distance this year! A big thank you to our clients, staff, family, and friends who took part in the fun. Here’s to even more adventures in 2025! Happy New Year from Lavelle Law!
Lavelle Law concludes the 2024 annual food drive.
By Lavelle Law December 30, 2024
Schaumburg-based Lavelle Law wrapped its annual food drive benefiting the Schaumburg Township Food Pantry. During the month of October, Lavelle Law set up collection boxes around Schaumburg and the surrounding area, where residents and workers could drop off nonperishable food items, paper goods, personal care items, baby food and diapers. Participants could also make cash donations online.
More Posts
Share by: