Blog Post

IRS Practice and Procedure News Briefs for July 2021

Joshua A. Nesser • July 27, 2021
A wooden judge 's gavel is sitting on top of a tax law book.


LATE-FILING PENALTIES – Lindsay v. U.S., Case No. 20-50994 (5th Cir. 2021)


Why this Case is Important: Taxpayers often believe that once they give a third party authority to file their tax return, they have fulfilled their obligation to file their return on time and can avoid being penalized for any late filing that is the third party’s fault. That is not the case.


Facts: In Lindsay, the taxpayer was incarcerated. He signed a power of attorney authorizing his accountant to manage his affairs during his incarceration, including filing his tax returns. Between 2012 and 2015, the attorney assured the taxpayer that his returns were being filed on time. Unfortunately for the taxpayer, the attorney never filed those returns and embezzled hundreds of thousands of dollars from the taxpayer. When the taxpayer eventually realized this, he filed his past-due returns. The IRS assessed over $425,000 in late-filing penalties. The taxpayer paid the penalties and filed suit in District Court requesting that the penalties be waived and refunded to him. The District Court found in favor of the IRS and the taxpayer appealed.


Law and Conclusion: Under Section 6651(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code, taxpayers are subject to penalties for failing to file returns on time unless the failure was due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect. Over time, the penalty can grow to as high as 25% of the unpaid tax due with the return. To demonstrate that reasonable cause exists for failure to timely file a return, an individual must demonstrate that he or she exercised ordinary business care and prudence but was unable to file the return on time due to circumstances outside of his or her control. While taxpayers often argue that they relied on a third party to file their return on time and that third party was to blame for the non-filing, the Supreme Court rejected this argument in the case of United States v. Boyle. In that case, the Supreme Court held that a taxpayer’s duty to file a tax return on time cannot be delegated, and that unlike cases where taxpayers rely on tax advice from experts to their detriment, occasionally warranting penalty abatement, “one does not have to be a tax expert to know that tax returns have fixed filing dates…” Relying on the holding in Boyle, the Appeals Court rejected the taxpayer’s argument and upheld the District Court’s decision in favor of the IRS.




IRS COLLECTION BEYOND STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS – Dean v. U.S., Case No. 20-14421 (11th. Cir. 2021)


Why this Case is Important: While the IRS generally has ten years from the date a return is filed to collect unpaid taxes, as this case demonstrates, in certain circumstances, the IRS is permitted to continue collecting even once that ten-year window has expired.


Facts: In Dean, the taxpayer owed the IRS over $2 million with respect to his 1997 through 2005 tax returns. The liabilities were assessed in 2007, meaning that the IRS generally had until sometime in 2017 to collect the liabilities. The IRS filed a tax lien against the taxpayer and, in 2013, began levying 100% of the taxpayer’s Social Security benefits. In 2017, with the statute of limitations on IRS collections expiring, the IRS released its tax lien and abated the assessments against the taxpayer. However, it continued to levy the taxpayer’s Social Security benefits. Believing that the levy should have been released, the taxpayer filed suit in District Court seeking a refund of $64,000 that the IRS had levied following the expiration of the statute of limitations. When the District Court found in favor of the IRS, the taxpayer appealed.

 

Law and Analysis: Under Section 6501(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code, the IRS has ten years from the date a tax liability is assessed to collect it, though that ten-year period can be extended in certain circumstances. Treasury Regulations make clear that a levy served after this ten-year period expires must be released, and that a continuing levy on salary or wages must be released when the ten-year period expires. However, those regulations also state that “a levy on a fixed and determinable right to payment, which right includes payments to be made after the period of limitations expires, does not become unenforceable upon the expiration of the period of limitations and will not be released under this condition unless the liability is satisfied.” As the Appeals Court explained, once individuals start collecting Social Security benefits, they have a fixed and determinable right to payment of their entire benefit – payment of the benefit is guaranteed and the amount to be paid is fixed. That being the case, when the IRS issued its levy on the taxpayer’s Social Security, it levied his fixed and determinable right to payment of the entire benefit, which was to be paid in monthly installments. Because this levy of his entire benefit was issued prior to the collection statute of limitations expiring, the IRS was not required to release the levy when the statute did expire. Therefore, the Appeals Court upheld the District Court’s decision and ruled in favor of the IRS.

 

If you would like more details about these cases, please contact me at 312-888-4113 or jnesser@lavellelaw.com.

More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

FinCEN Eliminates BOI Reporting Obligations!
By Frank P. Portera March 25, 2025
On March 21, 2025, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued its interim final rule stating that those entities previously classified as "domestic reporting companies" are now exempt from all BOI reporting requirements. On the other hand, all foreign entities registered to do business in the USA must file their own initial BOI reports within 30 days of the initial final rule's publication, if they have not done so already.
Join us April 3, 2025 for Business After Hours 5-7 PM
By Lavelle Law March 19, 2025
Spring is here, and with baseball season kicking off, we’re stepping up to the plate with our annual Lavelle Law Business After Hours event. We’re excited to partner with our friends in the Schaumburg business community for an evening of networking, good vibes, and a few surprises—all hosted in the friendly confines of our Schaumburg office. Bonus points: Feel free to rock your favorite baseball team’s gear and show off your fandom while you’re at it!
Delaware Court  Provides the Standard of Supreme Review for the Redomestication of Corporations
By Steven A. Migala and Anthony Letto March 12, 2025
Delaware corporations seeking to redomesticate to another state should be advised that on February 4, 2025, the Delaware Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Palkon v. Maffei, C.A. No. 2023-0449-JTL, addressing a challenge to TripAdvisor's redomestication from a Delaware corporation to a Nevada corporation. The case raised important questions regarding the standard of review applicable to such reincorporations, particularly when fiduciaries may derive a benefit from shifting to a legal regime perceived as more friendly.
Illinois residential zoning laws and significant opportunities for property owners.
By Chance W. Badertscher March 12, 2025
Recent legislative efforts in Illinois are reshaping the state’s approach to residential zoning, with significant implications for the housing market. A new bill, House Bill 1814, introduced last week, aims to eliminate single-family zoning in municipalities across Illinois. If passed, this bill will allow for the development of multi-unit buildings in areas currently zoned exclusively for single-family homes. This initiative, alongside a similar bill introduced last year, has the potential to address the state’s growing housing shortage and make housing more affordable for middle-class families.
LATEST UPDATE on the Corporate Transparency Act and BOI Report Filings
By Frank J. Portera and James Berg March 11, 2025
On February 27, 2025, FinCEN issued an immediate press release stating it would not impose fines, penalties, or take any other enforcement actions against companies that fail to file or update Beneficial Ownership Information ("BOI") reports pursuant to the Corporate Transparency Act ("CTA") by the current deadlines. FinCEN also announced that it would be revising BOI reporting deadlines through an interim final rule set to be issued no later than March 21, 2025.
IRS Releases its List of Dirty Dozen Tax Scams for 2025
By Timothy M. Hughes March 10, 2025
The IRS recently published its yearly list of most prevalent tax scams known as its Dirty Dozen. The list is obviously not exhaustive but an attempt to warn taxpayers of trends seen by the IRS. The IRS list of tax scams for 2025 came with a warning for taxpayers, businesses, and tax professionals to watch out for common schemes that threaten their tax and financial information.
Success Story – Small Business Owner Recovers Substantial Amount Levied by the State
By Tax Law March 5, 2025
Lavelle Law represented a small Illinois business owner who had accumulated a large sales tax balance due to their accountant’s negligence. Unbeknownst to the client Illinois Department of Revenue (“IDOR”) was at the levy issuance phase in its collection. And the IDOR levied the taxpayer’s account right after the taxpayer had deposited funds from a HELOC that was obtained to provide capital to the company for the next 6 plus months.
New statutory provisions on potential income included in new Illinois child support law.
By Joseph A. Olszowka February 27, 2025
The Illinois legislature has recently taken a significant step in closing a longstanding loophole in child support. This amendment represents a pivotal change in how courts assess and calculate child support obligations, providing greater protections against those who attempt to evade their financial responsibilities.
LATEST UPDATE on the Corporate Transparency Act and New Deadline for Filing BOIR
By Frank J. Portera February 20, 2025
This article will serve as another update to the ongoing Corporate Transparency Act developments. As of February 17, 2025, a federal judge in the Eastern District of Texas lifted the injunction it had ordered on January 7, 2025, in Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, 6:24-cv-00336 (E.D. Tex.), allowing the federal government to once again enforce the Corporate Transparency Act and its Beneficial Ownership Information Report requirements.
A Step-by-Step Guide to Bringing a Lawsuit in Illinois
By Sarah J. Reusché February 14, 2025
This article is the second in our Litigation 101 series. It focuses on the flip side: how to sue someone else. Suing someone is a serious decision that requires careful thought and preparation. Before pursuing legal action, it’s crucial to reflect on the issue and understand the steps involved in bringing a lawsuit. This article outlines the basics to help you approach the process with confidence and make informed decisions.
More Posts
Share by: