Blog Post

IRS Practice and Procedure News Briefs for January 2021

Joshua A. Nesser • January 27, 2021

DISCHARGE OF TAXES IN BANKRUPTCY – In re Alexander, Dk. No. 19-05033, Adv. Pro No. 19-5033 (D. Conn. 2020)


Why this Case is Important: While income taxes generally are dischargeable in bankruptcy, certain requirements must be met for a discharge to be granted. Filing bankruptcy too early, as the taxpayer did in this case, is a major mistake that could have been avoided with competent legal advice.


Facts: In Alexander, the taxpayer owed past-due income taxes for 2011 through 2015. She timely filed her returns for all of these years, including having filed her 2015 return on October 17, 2016. In February 2017, after the IRS threatened to take certain collection actions against the taxpayer with respect to her 2015 debt, she filed a request for a collection due process hearing. The hearing was not closed until October 2017. Under the Internal Revenue Code, the IRS was prohibited from taking action to collect the 2015 liability the entire time the hearing was open. On October 31, 2019, the taxpayer filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. In the course of the bankruptcy, she filed an adversary proceeding against the IRS in an effort to have her 2011 through 2015 liabilities discharged. The IRS conceded that the 2011 through 2014 liabilities should be discharged but contested the 2015 discharge on the basis that not enough time had passed between the filings of the taxpayer’s 2015 return and bankruptcy petition.


Law and Conclusion: Under Section 507(a)(8) of the Bankruptcy Code, income taxes are not dischargeable in bankruptcy unless (1) the tax return in question was due more than three years before the bankruptcy filing; (2) the return was filed more than two years before the bankruptcy filing; and (3) the tax to be discharged was assessed at least 240 days before the bankruptcy filing. These time periods are extended by the time that the IRS was prohibited from collecting the tax because of the taxpayer’s filing of a request for a collection due process hearing, plus 90 days. In this case, if the taxpayer had not requested a collection due process hearing, her 2015 taxes would have been dischargeable as of October 17, 2019 (three years after the 2015 return was due) and therefore would have been discharged by way of her October 31, 2019 bankruptcy filing. However, because the taxpayer’s collection due process hearing was open for eight months, during which time the IRS could not take action to collect her 2015 liability, her 2015 taxes were not dischargeable in bankruptcy until 3 years and 11 months after the 2015 return was due. With the return due in October 2016, the earliest the taxes could be discharged was September 2020. Therefore, the Court found in favor of the IRS and the 2015 taxes were not discharged.



UPDATING ADDRESS ON FILE WITH IRS – Gregory v. Commissioner, No. 19-2229 (3d Cir. 2020)


Why this Case is Important: This case reverses a decision of the Tax Court discussed in the April 2019 edition of Newsbriefs and eases the burden on taxpayers to update their addresses on file with the IRS by placing a greater burden on the IRS.


Facts: In Gregory, the taxpayers filed their 2014 joint income tax return using their home address in Jersey City, New Jersey. The IRS selected the return for examination. While the audit was ongoing, the taxpayers moved to Rutherford, New Jersey. In the course of the audit, the taxpayers used their new address in multiple forms they sent to the IRS, including a power of attorney and a consent to extend the statute of limitations, though they never filed an IRS Form 8822, Change of Address. When the IRS issued a Notice of Deficiency in 2016 proposing an assessment against them of additional taxes, it was sent to their old Jersey City address. As a result, the taxpayers did not receive the notice until January 2017, after the deadline for filing a Tax Court petition had passed. They still immediately filed a petition. In response, the IRS filed a motion to dismiss the petition for being filed late. The Tax Court granted the motion and dismissed the taxpayers’ petition based on them not having followed IRS procedures for updating their address by filing a Form 8822. The taxpayers appealed the decision to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.

 

Law and Analysis: While the IRS has provided specific guidance and instructions for taxpayers who need to update their address by means other than filing a tax return, the Court pointed to case law that has required the IRS to use reasonable diligence to determine a taxpayer’s last known address. “Reasonable diligence” is measured by what “the IRS knew or should have known at the time it sent the notice of deficiency,” including information it should know “through the use of its computer system.” Based on the taxpayers having submitted to the IRS a power of attorney and other forms showing their new address and verbally communicated their new address to IRS agents, the Court determined that the IRS should have reasonably known the taxpayers’ correct address. That being the case, the Court overturned the Tax Court’s grant of the IRS’s motion to dismiss, thereby allowing the taxpayers to move forward with their petition disputing the IRS’s notice of deficiency. It is worth noting that the Tax Court will only be required to follow this precedent in cases originating in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.


If you would like more details about these cases, please contact me at 312-888-4113 or jnesser@lavellelaw.com.


More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

FinCEN Eliminates BOI Reporting Obligations!
By Frank P. Portera March 25, 2025
On March 21, 2025, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued its interim final rule stating that those entities previously classified as "domestic reporting companies" are now exempt from all BOI reporting requirements. On the other hand, all foreign entities registered to do business in the USA must file their own initial BOI reports within 30 days of the initial final rule's publication, if they have not done so already.
Join us April 3, 2025 for Business After Hours 5-7 PM
By Lavelle Law March 19, 2025
Spring is here, and with baseball season kicking off, we’re stepping up to the plate with our annual Lavelle Law Business After Hours event. We’re excited to partner with our friends in the Schaumburg business community for an evening of networking, good vibes, and a few surprises—all hosted in the friendly confines of our Schaumburg office. Bonus points: Feel free to rock your favorite baseball team’s gear and show off your fandom while you’re at it!
Delaware Court  Provides the Standard of Supreme Review for the Redomestication of Corporations
By Steven A. Migala and Anthony Letto March 12, 2025
Delaware corporations seeking to redomesticate to another state should be advised that on February 4, 2025, the Delaware Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Palkon v. Maffei, C.A. No. 2023-0449-JTL, addressing a challenge to TripAdvisor's redomestication from a Delaware corporation to a Nevada corporation. The case raised important questions regarding the standard of review applicable to such reincorporations, particularly when fiduciaries may derive a benefit from shifting to a legal regime perceived as more friendly.
Illinois residential zoning laws and significant opportunities for property owners.
By Chance W. Badertscher March 12, 2025
Recent legislative efforts in Illinois are reshaping the state’s approach to residential zoning, with significant implications for the housing market. A new bill, House Bill 1814, introduced last week, aims to eliminate single-family zoning in municipalities across Illinois. If passed, this bill will allow for the development of multi-unit buildings in areas currently zoned exclusively for single-family homes. This initiative, alongside a similar bill introduced last year, has the potential to address the state’s growing housing shortage and make housing more affordable for middle-class families.
LATEST UPDATE on the Corporate Transparency Act and BOI Report Filings
By Frank J. Portera and James Berg March 11, 2025
On February 27, 2025, FinCEN issued an immediate press release stating it would not impose fines, penalties, or take any other enforcement actions against companies that fail to file or update Beneficial Ownership Information ("BOI") reports pursuant to the Corporate Transparency Act ("CTA") by the current deadlines. FinCEN also announced that it would be revising BOI reporting deadlines through an interim final rule set to be issued no later than March 21, 2025.
IRS Releases its List of Dirty Dozen Tax Scams for 2025
By Timothy M. Hughes March 10, 2025
The IRS recently published its yearly list of most prevalent tax scams known as its Dirty Dozen. The list is obviously not exhaustive but an attempt to warn taxpayers of trends seen by the IRS. The IRS list of tax scams for 2025 came with a warning for taxpayers, businesses, and tax professionals to watch out for common schemes that threaten their tax and financial information.
Success Story – Small Business Owner Recovers Substantial Amount Levied by the State
By Tax Law March 5, 2025
Lavelle Law represented a small Illinois business owner who had accumulated a large sales tax balance due to their accountant’s negligence. Unbeknownst to the client Illinois Department of Revenue (“IDOR”) was at the levy issuance phase in its collection. And the IDOR levied the taxpayer’s account right after the taxpayer had deposited funds from a HELOC that was obtained to provide capital to the company for the next 6 plus months.
New statutory provisions on potential income included in new Illinois child support law.
By Joseph A. Olszowka February 27, 2025
The Illinois legislature has recently taken a significant step in closing a longstanding loophole in child support. This amendment represents a pivotal change in how courts assess and calculate child support obligations, providing greater protections against those who attempt to evade their financial responsibilities.
LATEST UPDATE on the Corporate Transparency Act and New Deadline for Filing BOIR
By Frank J. Portera February 20, 2025
This article will serve as another update to the ongoing Corporate Transparency Act developments. As of February 17, 2025, a federal judge in the Eastern District of Texas lifted the injunction it had ordered on January 7, 2025, in Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, 6:24-cv-00336 (E.D. Tex.), allowing the federal government to once again enforce the Corporate Transparency Act and its Beneficial Ownership Information Report requirements.
A Step-by-Step Guide to Bringing a Lawsuit in Illinois
By Sarah J. Reusché February 14, 2025
This article is the second in our Litigation 101 series. It focuses on the flip side: how to sue someone else. Suing someone is a serious decision that requires careful thought and preparation. Before pursuing legal action, it’s crucial to reflect on the issue and understand the steps involved in bringing a lawsuit. This article outlines the basics to help you approach the process with confidence and make informed decisions.
More Posts
Share by: