Blog Post

Business Chapter 7 Bankruptcy

Theodore M. McGinn • May 12, 2020
When a business is no longer viable, owners must determine the best way to windup the affairs of the business, in an orderly and reasonable fashion. Simply walking away may create more problems and leave loose ends. Owners must typically choose between a Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing or a state dissolution. Which choice is best depends on the facts and circumstances.

Chapter 7 Bankruptcy. A business may end its existence through the filing of a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition. Upon the filing of the petition, the United States Bankruptcy Court will appoint a trustee. It is that trustee’s duty to confirm that the business has ceased operations, seize any valuable assets, facilitate the sale and otherwise maximize the proceeds of a liquidation of the business assets, and then coordinate the payment of the claims of any creditors through such bankruptcy proceeds. 

Bankruptcy Petition. In a Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing, the business must file a bankruptcy petition with the United States Bankruptcy Court. The bankruptcy petition is a public document. The bankruptcy petition discloses all of the assets of the company and all of its creditors, including the balances of the outstanding debt. The bankruptcy petition also discloses information about the operation of the business in its statement of financial affairs.

Potential Bankruptcy Issues. Upon the filing of the bankruptcy, the business ceases to exist. There is no discharge of liabilities; rather the business no longer is in existence. One problem that could arise would be claims related to a personal guaranty. Many creditors require owners of a business to sign a personal guaranty prior to extending credit. If a guaranty is present, the Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition would not have any impact on a claim of a creditor on any owner who signed a personal guaranty.

Many times leading to the end of a business cycle, owners may often begin to distribute payments to certain creditors, including themselves. Such payments could be recovered by the US trustee, as a preference or insider payment. Furthermore, similar issues may arise if the owners have been historically commingling their personal assets with the assets of the business.

Any business owner contemplating a bankruptcy must understand that they will have to attend a creditors meeting. A creditors meeting is an opportunity for the trustee and the creditors to inquire of the business representative of its financial affairs. They would be able to ask questions regarding the assets of a business, as well as any use of funds or any other relevant financial details.

Dissolution. A dissolution is another manner by which an owner may end the business existence. However, unlike a bankruptcy, a dissolution does not require the public filing of financial documents of the company. In addition, the dissolution is a procedure that is largely handled by the officers of the corporation through their attorneys. The officers are required to liquidate the assets of the company, similar to the US trustee, and distribute the proceeds from the sale assets to those filing claims. A dissolution may be preferred if it is desirable to avoid the publicity of a public bankruptcy filing. On the other hand, if a business is dealing with several creditors, the use of a bankruptcy may be advantageous to avoid the volume of creditor inquiries and other administrative duties.

Business owners have choices when deciding how to end their business. Such owners, however, should consider the pros and cons of each method and choose that which best suits their objectives.

If you have any questions about this article, please contact attorney Theodore M. McGinn at (847) 705-7555 or tmcginn@lavellelaw.com. We are a debt relief agency. We help people file for bankruptcy relief with the Bankruptcy Code.

More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

LATEST UPDATE on the Corporate Transparency Act and New Deadline for Filing BOIR
By Frank J. Portera February 20, 2025
This article will serve as another update to the ongoing Corporate Transparency Act developments. As of February 17, 2025, a federal judge in the Eastern District of Texas lifted the injunction it had ordered on January 7, 2025, in Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, 6:24-cv-00336 (E.D. Tex.), allowing the federal government to once again enforce the Corporate Transparency Act and its Beneficial Ownership Information Report requirements.
A Step-by-Step Guide to Bringing a Lawsuit in Illinois
By Sarah J. Reusché February 14, 2025
This article is the second in our Litigation 101 series. It focuses on the flip side: how to sue someone else. Suing someone is a serious decision that requires careful thought and preparation. Before pursuing legal action, it’s crucial to reflect on the issue and understand the steps involved in bringing a lawsuit. This article outlines the basics to help you approach the process with confidence and make informed decisions.
Updates Regarding the Corporate Transparency Act Hold: Key Implications for Businesses
By Frank J. Portera February 13, 2025
On December 11, 2024, we published an article titled “Corporate Transparency Act on Hold: Key Implications for Businesses,” which addressed the nationwide injunction impacting the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act and its Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting rule. Since then, there have been a few significant legal developments that businesses should monitor closely. While the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network is currently prohibited from enforcing BOIR requirements, ongoing litigation, and the related appeals may alter this status. Below, we provide a timeline of key events and insights into what business owners should anticipate moving forward.
IRS Special Payments Sent to 1 Million Taxpayers Who Did Not Claim 2021 Recovery Rebate Credit
By Timothy M. Hughes February 10, 2025
The Internal Revenue Service is issuing automatic payments to eligible people who did not claim a Recovery Rebate Credit on their 2021 tax returns. The payments are in follow up to an IRS announcement last month of the intent to take this special step. The IRS took this step after reviewing internal data showing many eligible taxpayers who filed a return but did not claim the credit. The Recovery Rebate Credit is a refundable credit for individuals who did not receive one or more Economic Impact Payments (“EIP”), also known as stimulus payments.
SCOTUS Resolves Circuit Split on FLSA Exemption Standard
By Steven A. Migala February 5, 2025
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) establishes federal minimum wage and overtime pay requirements, with exemptions for employees in bona fide executive, administrative, professional, computer or outside sales roles. 29 U.S.C. § 213. Employees classified as "outside sales" must primarily engage in making sales or obtaining contracts for services or the use of facilities, and they must conduct their work primarily away from their employer’s place of business. 29 C.F.R. § 541.500.
Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA)
By Sarah J. Reusché January 23, 2025
Amendments to BIPA SB 2929 became effective on August 2, 2024. Codified as 740 ILCS 14/10 and 14/20, this Act introduced two pivotal changes to BIPA that dealers should be aware of: • Limiting Per-Scan Damages: The amendments clarify that a single violation under BIPA accrues per type of violation, rather than per scan. This significantly reduces the financial exposure for dealerships. • Electronic Consent: The amendments formalize electronic signatures as a valid means of securing biometric consent, streamlining compliance processes for businesses.
IRS National Taxpayer Advocate Releases Annual Report to Congress. And in an Unrelated Matter DOJ Ta
By Timothy M. Hughes January 10, 2025
The National Taxpayer Advocate recently released her annual report to Congress. A few highlights from the report are summarized in this article.
Nearly 300 New Illinois Laws are going into effect in 2025.
By Lavelle Law January 8, 2025
Nearly 300 New Illinois Laws are going into effect in 2025. Listed below are some that may have a significant impact on you or your business.
Happy New Year and Cheers to New Adventures in 2025!
By Lavelle Law December 31, 2024
As we say farewell to 2024, we’re excited to look back on the unforgettable moments from our Koozie Challenge! From the frozen wonders of Antarctica to the excitement of the Paris Olympics, and countless incredible destinations in between, the Lavelle Law koozie truly went the distance this year! A big thank you to our clients, staff, family, and friends who took part in the fun. Here’s to even more adventures in 2025! Happy New Year from Lavelle Law!
Lavelle Law concludes the 2024 annual food drive.
By Lavelle Law December 30, 2024
Schaumburg-based Lavelle Law wrapped its annual food drive benefiting the Schaumburg Township Food Pantry. During the month of October, Lavelle Law set up collection boxes around Schaumburg and the surrounding area, where residents and workers could drop off nonperishable food items, paper goods, personal care items, baby food and diapers. Participants could also make cash donations online.
More Posts
Share by: