Blog Post

Banking and Business – February 2025

Steven A. Migala • February 5, 2025

SCOTUS Resolves Circuit Split on FLSA Exemption Standard

 

BACKGROUND

 

The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) establishes federal minimum wage and overtime pay requirements, with exemptions for employees in bona fide executive, administrative, professional, computer or outside sales roles. 29 U.S.C. § 213. Employees classified as "outside sales" must primarily engage in making sales or obtaining contracts for services or the use of facilities, and they must conduct their work primarily away from their employer’s place of business. 29 C.F.R. § 541.500.


Until recently, a key question for employers has been: What standard of proof is required to demonstrate that an employee qualifies for an FLSA exemption? This issue led to a circuit split, with the Fourth Circuit applying a heightened clear and convincing evidence standard, while other circuits, such as the Fifth Circuit, adhered to the more common preponderance of the evidence standard. See Carrera v. E.M.D. Sales Inc., 75 F.4th 345 (4th Cir. 2023); Adams v. All Coast, L.L.C., 15 F.4th 365 (5th Cir. 2021).


In 2025, the Supreme Court of the United States resolved this dispute in E.M.D. Sales Inc. v. Carrera, 220 L.Ed. 2d 309 (2025), holding that the preponderance of the evidence standard applies when proving FLSA exemptions.

 

CASE HISTORY

 

E.M.D. Sales Inc. (EMD), a food product distributor in the Washington, D.C. area, employed sales representatives responsible for managing inventory and taking orders at grocery stores. Carrera v. E.M.D. Sales, Inc., 402 F.Supp. 3d 128, 129 (D. Md. 2019). Several of these sales representatives sued EMD, alleging that they were misclassified as outside sales employees and were therefore entitled to overtime pay under the FLSA. Id.


EMD argued that the employees fell under the FLSA’s outside sales exemption. Id. at 146. However, the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland ruled that EMD failed to prove the exemption by clear and convincing evidence, concluding that the employees primarily executed pre-existing sales agreements rather than making independent sales. Id.


On appeal, EMD contended that the preponderance of the evidence standard should apply, as it is the standard used in most civil litigation. Carrera v. E.M.D. Sales Inc., 75 F. 4th,  345, 351 (4th Cir. 2023). The Fourth Circuit disagreed, affirming its precedent that FLSA exemptions must be proven by clear and convincing evidence. Id. at 355.


SCOTUS DECISION


The Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve the circuit split on the appropriate burden of proof for FLSA exemptions. E.M.D. Sales, 220 L.Ed. 2d 309, 314 (2025). The plaintiffs argued for a heightened standard, citing the public interest in protecting employees and the non-waivable nature of FLSA rights. However, the Court rejected this argument, noting that other employment laws with significant public policy implications—such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act—use the preponderance of the evidence standard. Id. at 316.


The Supreme Court held that preponderance of the evidence is the correct standard for proving FLSA exemptions. Id. at 317. The Court emphasized that preponderance of the evidence is the default standard in civil litigation unless a statute or constitutional provision mandates a higher standard, or the case involves coercive government action—neither of which applied in E.M.D. Sales. Id. at 312.

 

TAKEAWAYS


The Supreme Court’s ruling provides clarity and consistency for employers, but it also underscores the importance of correctly classifying employees. In our M&A practice, we are seeing employee misclassification as a hot diligence issue. Employers should consider the following:


  1. Ensure Proper Classification – Employers must carefully assess whether employees classified as exempt truly meet the job duties and salary threshold tests under the FLSA. Misclassification can lead to costly class action lawsuits and substantial back pay liability. In the M&A context, misclassification can lead to buyers requesting additional indemnification and holdbacks from the purchase price.
  2. Conduct Internal Audits – Employers should work with counsel to conduct regular internal audits to ensure that job duties and salaries align with both federal and state exemption requirements. Importantly, state laws may impose stricter exemption standards, and compliance with federal law alone may not be sufficient. If an employee qualifies as exempt under federal law but not under state law, state law governs, and the employee must receive overtime pay.
  3. Monitor Federal and State Regulations – Employers should stay informed on wage and hour law developments, including the Department of Labor’s April 23 Final Rule increasing the federal overtime salary threshold. The Trump administration’s approach to enforcement will be key in shaping future compliance requirements.


While the Supreme Court’s decision in E.M.D. Sales Inc. v. Carrera is a favorable development for employers, making it easier to prove FLSA exemptions, employers must remain vigilant in properly classifying employees, conducting compliance audits, and staying current with federal and state labor laws.


For further inquiries or questions, please contact me at smigala@lavellelaw.com or (847) 705-7555.

More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

Delaware Court  Provides the Standard of Supreme Review for the Redomestication of Corporations
By Steven A. Migala and Anthony Letto March 12, 2025
Delaware corporations seeking to redomesticate to another state should be advised that on February 4, 2025, the Delaware Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Palkon v. Maffei, C.A. No. 2023-0449-JTL, addressing a challenge to TripAdvisor's redomestication from a Delaware corporation to a Nevada corporation. The case raised important questions regarding the standard of review applicable to such reincorporations, particularly when fiduciaries may derive a benefit from shifting to a legal regime perceived as more friendly.
Illinois residential zoning laws and significant opportunities for property owners.
By Chance W. Badertscher March 12, 2025
Recent legislative efforts in Illinois are reshaping the state’s approach to residential zoning, with significant implications for the housing market. A new bill, House Bill 1814, introduced last week, aims to eliminate single-family zoning in municipalities across Illinois. If passed, this bill will allow for the development of multi-unit buildings in areas currently zoned exclusively for single-family homes. This initiative, alongside a similar bill introduced last year, has the potential to address the state’s growing housing shortage and make housing more affordable for middle-class families.
LATEST UPDATE on the Corporate Transparency Act and BOI Report Filings
By Frank J. Portera and James Berg March 11, 2025
On February 27, 2025, FinCEN issued an immediate press release stating it would not impose fines, penalties, or take any other enforcement actions against companies that fail to file or update Beneficial Ownership Information ("BOI") reports pursuant to the Corporate Transparency Act ("CTA") by the current deadlines. FinCEN also announced that it would be revising BOI reporting deadlines through an interim final rule set to be issued no later than March 21, 2025.
IRS Releases its List of Dirty Dozen Tax Scams for 2025
By Timothy M. Hughes March 10, 2025
The IRS recently published its yearly list of most prevalent tax scams known as its Dirty Dozen. The list is obviously not exhaustive but an attempt to warn taxpayers of trends seen by the IRS. The IRS list of tax scams for 2025 came with a warning for taxpayers, businesses, and tax professionals to watch out for common schemes that threaten their tax and financial information.
Success Story – Small Business Owner Recovers Substantial Amount Levied by the State
By Tax Law March 5, 2025
Lavelle Law represented a small Illinois business owner who had accumulated a large sales tax balance due to their accountant’s negligence. Unbeknownst to the client Illinois Department of Revenue (“IDOR”) was at the levy issuance phase in its collection. And the IDOR levied the taxpayer’s account right after the taxpayer had deposited funds from a HELOC that was obtained to provide capital to the company for the next 6 plus months.
New statutory provisions on potential income included in new Illinois child support law.
By Joseph A. Olszowka February 27, 2025
The Illinois legislature has recently taken a significant step in closing a longstanding loophole in child support. This amendment represents a pivotal change in how courts assess and calculate child support obligations, providing greater protections against those who attempt to evade their financial responsibilities.
LATEST UPDATE on the Corporate Transparency Act and New Deadline for Filing BOIR
By Frank J. Portera February 20, 2025
This article will serve as another update to the ongoing Corporate Transparency Act developments. As of February 17, 2025, a federal judge in the Eastern District of Texas lifted the injunction it had ordered on January 7, 2025, in Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, 6:24-cv-00336 (E.D. Tex.), allowing the federal government to once again enforce the Corporate Transparency Act and its Beneficial Ownership Information Report requirements.
A Step-by-Step Guide to Bringing a Lawsuit in Illinois
By Sarah J. Reusché February 14, 2025
This article is the second in our Litigation 101 series. It focuses on the flip side: how to sue someone else. Suing someone is a serious decision that requires careful thought and preparation. Before pursuing legal action, it’s crucial to reflect on the issue and understand the steps involved in bringing a lawsuit. This article outlines the basics to help you approach the process with confidence and make informed decisions.
Updates Regarding the Corporate Transparency Act Hold: Key Implications for Businesses
By Frank J. Portera February 13, 2025
On December 11, 2024, we published an article titled “Corporate Transparency Act on Hold: Key Implications for Businesses,” which addressed the nationwide injunction impacting the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act and its Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting rule. Since then, there have been a few significant legal developments that businesses should monitor closely. While the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network is currently prohibited from enforcing BOIR requirements, ongoing litigation, and the related appeals may alter this status. Below, we provide a timeline of key events and insights into what business owners should anticipate moving forward.
Understand the new Illinois employment laws taking effect in 2025.
By Lance C. Ziebell and Kelly A. Anderson February 12, 2025
Watch this video to understand the new Illinois employment laws taking effect in 2025 and learn how to protect your business. This video was recorded on January 29, during a Lavelle Law Breakfast Briefs presentation with attorneys, Lance Ziebell and Kelly Anderson.
More Posts
Share by: