Blog Post

Banking and Business Monthly – November 2022

Steven A. Migala • November 17, 2022

Asset Purchase vs. Equity Purchase

A man in a suit and tie is writing in a notebook.


Our transactional team is in the middle of another busy Q4 push to get M&A deals done by year-end. A question we are often asked is how to structure the sale of the business – whether it should be an asset purchase or an equity purchase. Like any good attorney response, the answer is that it depends on the facts. Each type of transaction differs in terms of what is being acquired and its tax consequences. Below is a quick overview.

 

ASSET PURCHASE

 

In an asset purchase, the buyer agrees to purchase specific assets and liabilities, such as working capital (accounts receivable and payable), inventory, furniture, fixtures, equipment, contracts, licenses, and intellectual property such as trade names, trade secrets, and customer lists. The buyer takes on the risks only associated with those assets and liabilities purchased, with the seller retaining ownership of the remaining assets (typically cash, bank accounts, tax assets, organizational documents, and personnel records, among others) and liabilities.

 

Advantages

 

Most buyers prefer asset purchases so that they can pick and choose which assets and liabilities they want to acquire. Buyers can thus exclude unwanted assets, such as old inventory and equipment, and can exclude many liabilities. In addition, buyers prefer asset purchases due to the tax advantages of acquiring a stepped-up basis in the purchased assets, so that they can depreciate or amortize them.

 

Disadvantages

 

Sellers often have to pay higher taxes in an asset sale, as more of the gain may be considered ordinary income versus capital gain. Asset purchases also carry additional complexity because specific assets must be assigned to the buyer. There may be assignment provisions in the underlying contractual relationships that require obtaining consent from third parties, such as customers, lenders, and landlords. Often, these relationships may need to be renegotiated, adding complexity and time to the deal. For example, a customer may be resistant to signing a new contract with the buyer, or a landlord may insist on onerous new terms. Employment agreements with key employees may need to be negotiated as well. Finally, certain businesses are easier to sell by way of an equity purchase instead of an asset purchase, such as a trucking company with a large fleet of vehicles (and all of the underlying certificates of title which would otherwise need to be assigned), or a company with an important license or permit that is not assignable by its terms.

 

EQUITY PURCHASE

 

In an equity purchase, the buyer purchases the stock, membership interests, or other equity of the company, which represents a sale of the entire company rather than specific assets and liabilities.

 

Advantages

 

As mentioned above, buyers may prefer an equity purchase due to its simplicity, since buyers would be purchasing the entire company without needing to ensure specific assets and liabilities are assigned correctly. No retitling of assets or obtaining third-party consents to contract assignments generally would be necessary since the underlying company continues operations under its existing contracts (absent any change-in-control provisions). Sellers often prefer equity purchases as well for tax purposes because more of the gain on the sale would be taxed at lower capital gains rates.

 

Disadvantages

 

That simplicity for buyers, however, comes with the cost of losing the tax benefits of a stepped-up basis in the company’s underlying assets. Also, the buyer could be inheriting undesirable business assets and liabilities, in addition to those business assets and liabilities they do want. Finally, there may be issues with minority equityholders who are not required to sell to the buyer.

 

The facts and circumstances of the seller, buyer, and underlying business all come into play and require careful planning to minimize risks and maximize sales proceeds. Sellers and buyers are encouraged to assemble a team of tax advisors and attorneys to assist with the transaction before any letter of intent is signed.



For further inquiries or questions about asset and equity purchases or other banking or business matters, please contact me at smigala@lavellelaw.com or at (847) 705-7555.

More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

LATEST UPDATE on the Corporate Transparency Act and New Deadline for Filing BOIR
By Frank J. Portera February 20, 2025
This article will serve as another update to the ongoing Corporate Transparency Act developments. As of February 17, 2025, a federal judge in the Eastern District of Texas lifted the injunction it had ordered on January 7, 2025, in Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, 6:24-cv-00336 (E.D. Tex.), allowing the federal government to once again enforce the Corporate Transparency Act and its Beneficial Ownership Information Report requirements.
A Step-by-Step Guide to Bringing a Lawsuit in Illinois
By Sarah J. Reusché February 14, 2025
This article is the second in our Litigation 101 series. It focuses on the flip side: how to sue someone else. Suing someone is a serious decision that requires careful thought and preparation. Before pursuing legal action, it’s crucial to reflect on the issue and understand the steps involved in bringing a lawsuit. This article outlines the basics to help you approach the process with confidence and make informed decisions.
Updates Regarding the Corporate Transparency Act Hold: Key Implications for Businesses
By Frank J. Portera February 13, 2025
On December 11, 2024, we published an article titled “Corporate Transparency Act on Hold: Key Implications for Businesses,” which addressed the nationwide injunction impacting the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act and its Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting rule. Since then, there have been a few significant legal developments that businesses should monitor closely. While the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network is currently prohibited from enforcing BOIR requirements, ongoing litigation, and the related appeals may alter this status. Below, we provide a timeline of key events and insights into what business owners should anticipate moving forward.
IRS Special Payments Sent to 1 Million Taxpayers Who Did Not Claim 2021 Recovery Rebate Credit
By Timothy M. Hughes February 10, 2025
The Internal Revenue Service is issuing automatic payments to eligible people who did not claim a Recovery Rebate Credit on their 2021 tax returns. The payments are in follow up to an IRS announcement last month of the intent to take this special step. The IRS took this step after reviewing internal data showing many eligible taxpayers who filed a return but did not claim the credit. The Recovery Rebate Credit is a refundable credit for individuals who did not receive one or more Economic Impact Payments (“EIP”), also known as stimulus payments.
SCOTUS Resolves Circuit Split on FLSA Exemption Standard
By Steven A. Migala February 5, 2025
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) establishes federal minimum wage and overtime pay requirements, with exemptions for employees in bona fide executive, administrative, professional, computer or outside sales roles. 29 U.S.C. § 213. Employees classified as "outside sales" must primarily engage in making sales or obtaining contracts for services or the use of facilities, and they must conduct their work primarily away from their employer’s place of business. 29 C.F.R. § 541.500.
Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA)
By Sarah J. Reusché January 23, 2025
Amendments to BIPA SB 2929 became effective on August 2, 2024. Codified as 740 ILCS 14/10 and 14/20, this Act introduced two pivotal changes to BIPA that dealers should be aware of: • Limiting Per-Scan Damages: The amendments clarify that a single violation under BIPA accrues per type of violation, rather than per scan. This significantly reduces the financial exposure for dealerships. • Electronic Consent: The amendments formalize electronic signatures as a valid means of securing biometric consent, streamlining compliance processes for businesses.
IRS National Taxpayer Advocate Releases Annual Report to Congress. And in an Unrelated Matter DOJ Ta
By Timothy M. Hughes January 10, 2025
The National Taxpayer Advocate recently released her annual report to Congress. A few highlights from the report are summarized in this article.
Nearly 300 New Illinois Laws are going into effect in 2025.
By Lavelle Law January 8, 2025
Nearly 300 New Illinois Laws are going into effect in 2025. Listed below are some that may have a significant impact on you or your business.
Happy New Year and Cheers to New Adventures in 2025!
By Lavelle Law December 31, 2024
As we say farewell to 2024, we’re excited to look back on the unforgettable moments from our Koozie Challenge! From the frozen wonders of Antarctica to the excitement of the Paris Olympics, and countless incredible destinations in between, the Lavelle Law koozie truly went the distance this year! A big thank you to our clients, staff, family, and friends who took part in the fun. Here’s to even more adventures in 2025! Happy New Year from Lavelle Law!
Lavelle Law concludes the 2024 annual food drive.
By Lavelle Law December 30, 2024
Schaumburg-based Lavelle Law wrapped its annual food drive benefiting the Schaumburg Township Food Pantry. During the month of October, Lavelle Law set up collection boxes around Schaumburg and the surrounding area, where residents and workers could drop off nonperishable food items, paper goods, personal care items, baby food and diapers. Participants could also make cash donations online.
More Posts
Share by: