Banking and Business Monthly – February 2020

Steven A. Migala • February 6, 2020

FTC’S REVISED HART-SCOTT-RODINO FILING THRESHOLDS FOR M&A TRANSACTIONS AND THE FTC’S ADJUSTED THRESHOLDS FOR INTERLOCKING DIRECTORATES

A. FTC’s Revised Hart-Scott-Rodino Filing Thresholds for M&A Transactions

The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced revised thresholds used for pre-acquisition filings under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act (“HSR”). These take effect on February 27, 2020. Under the new thresholds, the parties to a merger, consolidation or acquisition of voting securities or substantial assets will in most cases need to file pre-acquisition notifications with the FTC and the Department of Justice and observe the HSR waiting periods before closing if the transaction meets one or more tests which look at both the size of the transaction and the sizes of the persons in the transaction.

Size of Transaction: This test is both a floor below which no filing is required and a threshold for automatic filing regardless of the size of the persons discussed below. No filings are required for transactions under $94 million this year notwithstanding the size of the persons. If the value of the securities or assets exceeds $376 million, then the persons must report the transaction notwithstanding the size of the persons.

Size of Person: If the value of the securities and assets held as a result of the transaction is between $94 million and $376 million, the transaction must be reported in most cases if either the acquired or acquiring party has annual net sales or total assets of at least $18.8 million and the other party to the transaction has at least $188 million in annual net sales or total assets. For the purposes of applying the above thresholds, “person” means the ultimate parent entity of the party engaged in the transaction.

Filing Fees: The amounts of the filing fees have not changed, but the thresholds are increased as follows:


  • Transactions valued at more than $94 million but less than $188 million pay $45,000.
  • Transactions valued at $188 million or more but less than $940.1 million pay $125,000.
  • Transactions valued at $940.1 million or more pay $280,000.

Note that certain exemptions may apply depending on the nature of the transaction and the nature and location of the assets and entities involved. Consequently, additional analysis is often required before making a final determination regarding the need for an HSR filing. Counsel is recommended, as noncompliance with HSR leads to significant penalties. We can assist with this analysis.


B. FTC’s Adjusted Thresholds for Interlocking Directorates

The FTC also published revised thresholds for interlocking directorates under Section 8 of the Clayton Act. Section 8 generally prohibits one person from serving as a director or officer of two competing corporations if each has capital, surplus and undivided profits (i.e., net worth) of more than $38,204,000 (up from $36,564,000). Section 8 provides for several exceptions where competitive overlaps are “too small to have competitive significance.” For example, the parties will not violate Section 8 where the competing sales of either corporation are less than $3,820,400 (up from $3,656,400); the competing sales of either corporation are less than 2% of the corporation’s total sales; or the competing sales of each corporation are less than 4% of the corporation’s total sales.

As with HSR above, failure to comply with Section 8 may have dire consequences for applicable companies and individuals. Businesses should consult with their counsel to determine whether Section 8 applies before proceeding with a potential transaction within its scope.


Steven A. Migala is a partner at Lavelle Law and possesses over 20 years of providing excellent representation to banks, businesses, and individuals in a variety of matters. He can be contacted at (847) 705-7555 and smigala@lavellelaw.com.

More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

$9.9 Million Dollar Purchase of Packaged Multi-Unit Properties
By Commercial Real Estate April 18, 2025
Lavelle Law represented a joint venture in its $9.9 million acquisition of four multi-unit buildings.
Type F Reorg offers a means of achieving structural change while preserving tax continuity
By Steven A. Migala and Nathan P. Toy April 14, 2025
A Type F reorganization (“F Reorg”), governed by Section 368(a)(1)(F) of the Internal Revenue Code, provides a strategically significant mechanism for corporate restructuring. Defined as a “mere change in identity, form, or place of organization of one corporation,” an F Reorg permits a corporation to alter its legal existence while being treated for federal tax purposes as the same entity. This recharacterization allows for the uninterrupted preservation of tax attributes while maintaining shareholder continuity.
Estate Planning for Your Pet: Securing Your Pet’s Future with a Pet Trust
By Jackie R. Luthringshausen April 10, 2025
When it comes to estate planning, most people think about providing for their loved ones—but what about the furry, feathered, or scaled members of your family? In the United States, 68% of households own at least one pet, according to the American Pet Products Association’s 2023-2024 National Pet Owners Survey. For many, pets are more than just companions—they’re family. Ensuring their care after your death or incapacity is a vital part of comprehensive estate planning. In Illinois, a Pet Trust offers a powerful solution to guarantee your pet’s well-being long after you’re gone.
IRS Press Release Addresses Payment Plan Options
By Timothy M. Hughes April 10, 2025
IRS Press Release Addresses Payment Plan Options - A recent press release by the IRS addressed the options that are available to taxpayers who may owe more on April 15th than they can pay. The IRS advised taxpayers that they do not need to wait until April 15 to file their 2024 federal return, and if they owe and are unable to pay the balance in full, there are payment plans available to help them pay their tax obligation.
Learn about essential legal protections to strengthen your business and safeguard your interests.
By Lavelle Law April 9, 2025
Join us on May 21 in Schaumburg for an engaging Breakfast Briefs seminar, delving into vital strategies to fortify your business. This session will explore the critical role of crafting ironclad non-compete agreements, shielding your trade secrets, and mastering the nuances of temporary restraining orders (TROs) and injunctive relief. Our presenters, attorneys Matthew Sheahin and Jennifer Tee, bring a wealth of experience in this legal domain. Seize this chance to bolster your company’s legal protections and lay a solid groundwork for enduring success!
FinCEN Eliminates BOI Reporting Obligations!
By Frank P. Portera March 25, 2025
On March 21, 2025, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued its interim final rule stating that those entities previously classified as "domestic reporting companies" are now exempt from all BOI reporting requirements. On the other hand, all foreign entities registered to do business in the USA must file their own initial BOI reports within 30 days of the initial final rule's publication, if they have not done so already.
Join us April 3, 2025 for Business After Hours 5-7 PM
By Lavelle Law March 19, 2025
Spring is here, and with baseball season kicking off, we’re stepping up to the plate with our annual Lavelle Law Business After Hours event. We’re excited to partner with our friends in the Schaumburg business community for an evening of networking, good vibes, and a few surprises—all hosted in the friendly confines of our Schaumburg office. Bonus points: Feel free to rock your favorite baseball team’s gear and show off your fandom while you’re at it!
Delaware Court  Provides the Standard of Supreme Review for the Redomestication of Corporations
By Steven A. Migala and Anthony Letto March 12, 2025
Delaware corporations seeking to redomesticate to another state should be advised that on February 4, 2025, the Delaware Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Palkon v. Maffei, C.A. No. 2023-0449-JTL, addressing a challenge to TripAdvisor's redomestication from a Delaware corporation to a Nevada corporation. The case raised important questions regarding the standard of review applicable to such reincorporations, particularly when fiduciaries may derive a benefit from shifting to a legal regime perceived as more friendly.
Illinois residential zoning laws and significant opportunities for property owners.
By Chance W. Badertscher March 12, 2025
Recent legislative efforts in Illinois are reshaping the state’s approach to residential zoning, with significant implications for the housing market. A new bill, House Bill 1814, introduced last week, aims to eliminate single-family zoning in municipalities across Illinois. If passed, this bill will allow for the development of multi-unit buildings in areas currently zoned exclusively for single-family homes. This initiative, alongside a similar bill introduced last year, has the potential to address the state’s growing housing shortage and make housing more affordable for middle-class families.
LATEST UPDATE on the Corporate Transparency Act and BOI Report Filings
By Frank J. Portera and James Berg March 11, 2025
On February 27, 2025, FinCEN issued an immediate press release stating it would not impose fines, penalties, or take any other enforcement actions against companies that fail to file or update Beneficial Ownership Information ("BOI") reports pursuant to the Corporate Transparency Act ("CTA") by the current deadlines. FinCEN also announced that it would be revising BOI reporting deadlines through an interim final rule set to be issued no later than March 21, 2025.
More Posts