A Wrench in the Wheels of Justice - COVID-19’s Effect on Civil Litigation in Illinois

Thomas J. Fox • December 16, 2020

COVID-19 affected nearly every area of our lives this year and the court system was no different. At the beginning of this pandemic, nearly all state-level courts were effectively shut down for civil litigation, with no hearings, and, occasionally, no way to even present a motion. While courts have adapted since then by implementing Zoom to hold hearings and sometimes bench trials, it will be quite some time until things are restored to “normal,” and both practitioners and potential litigants should make themselves familiar with this new process.


At this point, nearly all state-level courts in the Chicago area (as well as the federal Northern District) have changed their procedures to allow the use of Zoom or conference calls. One notable exception is McHenry County, which continues to routinely offer in-person court dates in addition to conference calls. Beyond that, court availability can vary widely between counties or even by individual judges. For example, some courts have agreed to hold bench trials, either through Zoom or in-person, under controlled circumstances (such as limiting the number of witnesses in the courtroom at a given time), while others, like DuPage County, have postponed all civil bench trials until 2021 unless the parties agree to hold them virtually.


Jury trials present their own challenges through the obvious difficulty in assembling a pool of jurors while maintaining the appropriate COVID-19 protective measures. For that reason, most courts were clear early on in the pandemic that they would not even consider scheduling jury trials for the time being. Civil jury trials remain largely out of reach, and in cases with little remaining except for trial, courts are encouraging litigants to switch to a bench trial, or at a minimum reduce their jury demand from twelve to six, to make a trial more feasible.


Finally, one other key area of civil litigation is effectively frozen for the foreseeable future: post-judgment proceedings for individual defendants. On April 14, 2020, Governor Pritzker entered an executive order barring any such procedures including citations to discover assets and wage garnishments. See Exec. Order 25. That Order has been renewed nine times since then, most recently until January 2021, and may remain in effect until a vaccine becomes widely available and other protective measures are lifted. For plaintiffs suing individuals, as opposed to corporate entities, this can be a frustrating experience as even if they prevail, they currently have no meaningful way to enforce that judgment.


It is more important than ever to secure solid advice on the best way to proceed with a lawsuit, including a realistic timeframe of when you can obtain that legal relief. If you have questions or would like more information on this subject, please feel free to contact attorney Thomas Fox at 847-705-7555 or tfox@lavellelaw.com.


More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

The Junk Fee Ban Act and pricing transparency legislation.
By Sarah J. Reusché and Jacob Rotolo April 23, 2025
If enacted, the Junk Fee Ban Act would protect consumers from hidden fees and promote fair business practices in Illinois. While there has yet to be legislation in the proposed Junk Fee Ban Act that excludes dealerships, it will be important to look for future updates on this bill, as Illinois is quickly becoming a hub for vehicle innovation and automotive plant expansion.
Ancillary probate is required when a person dies owning real estate outside of their home state.
By Heather A. McCollum April 21, 2025
When someone passes away owning property in another state, their estate may need to go through ancillary probate—a secondary court process in that state.
$9.9 Million Dollar Purchase of Packaged Multi-Unit Properties
By Commercial Real Estate April 18, 2025
Lavelle Law represented a joint venture in its $9.9 million acquisition of four multi-unit buildings.
Type F Reorg offers a means of achieving structural change while preserving tax continuity
By Steven A. Migala and Nathan P. Toy April 14, 2025
A Type F reorganization (“F Reorg”), governed by Section 368(a)(1)(F) of the Internal Revenue Code, provides a strategically significant mechanism for corporate restructuring. Defined as a “mere change in identity, form, or place of organization of one corporation,” an F Reorg permits a corporation to alter its legal existence while being treated for federal tax purposes as the same entity. This recharacterization allows for the uninterrupted preservation of tax attributes while maintaining shareholder continuity.
Estate Planning for Your Pet: Securing Your Pet’s Future with a Pet Trust
By Jackie R. Luthringshausen April 10, 2025
When it comes to estate planning, most people think about providing for their loved ones—but what about the furry, feathered, or scaled members of your family? In the United States, 68% of households own at least one pet, according to the American Pet Products Association’s 2023-2024 National Pet Owners Survey. For many, pets are more than just companions—they’re family. Ensuring their care after your death or incapacity is a vital part of comprehensive estate planning. In Illinois, a Pet Trust offers a powerful solution to guarantee your pet’s well-being long after you’re gone.
IRS Press Release Addresses Payment Plan Options
By Timothy M. Hughes April 10, 2025
IRS Press Release Addresses Payment Plan Options - A recent press release by the IRS addressed the options that are available to taxpayers who may owe more on April 15th than they can pay. The IRS advised taxpayers that they do not need to wait until April 15 to file their 2024 federal return, and if they owe and are unable to pay the balance in full, there are payment plans available to help them pay their tax obligation.
Learn about essential legal protections to strengthen your business and safeguard your interests.
By Lavelle Law April 9, 2025
Join us on May 21 in Schaumburg for an engaging Breakfast Briefs seminar, delving into vital strategies to fortify your business. This session will explore the critical role of crafting ironclad non-compete agreements, shielding your trade secrets, and mastering the nuances of temporary restraining orders (TROs) and injunctive relief. Our presenters, attorneys Matthew Sheahin and Jennifer Tee, bring a wealth of experience in this legal domain. Seize this chance to bolster your company’s legal protections and lay a solid groundwork for enduring success!
FinCEN Eliminates BOI Reporting Obligations!
By Frank P. Portera March 25, 2025
On March 21, 2025, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued its interim final rule stating that those entities previously classified as "domestic reporting companies" are now exempt from all BOI reporting requirements. On the other hand, all foreign entities registered to do business in the USA must file their own initial BOI reports within 30 days of the initial final rule's publication, if they have not done so already.
Join us April 3, 2025 for Business After Hours 5-7 PM
By Lavelle Law March 19, 2025
Spring is here, and with baseball season kicking off, we’re stepping up to the plate with our annual Lavelle Law Business After Hours event. We’re excited to partner with our friends in the Schaumburg business community for an evening of networking, good vibes, and a few surprises—all hosted in the friendly confines of our Schaumburg office. Bonus points: Feel free to rock your favorite baseball team’s gear and show off your fandom while you’re at it!
Delaware Court  Provides the Standard of Supreme Review for the Redomestication of Corporations
By Steven A. Migala and Anthony Letto March 12, 2025
Delaware corporations seeking to redomesticate to another state should be advised that on February 4, 2025, the Delaware Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Palkon v. Maffei, C.A. No. 2023-0449-JTL, addressing a challenge to TripAdvisor's redomestication from a Delaware corporation to a Nevada corporation. The case raised important questions regarding the standard of review applicable to such reincorporations, particularly when fiduciaries may derive a benefit from shifting to a legal regime perceived as more friendly.
More Posts