Blog Post

Trademark Rights and Common Misunderstandings

Theodore M. McGinn • June 29, 2021
A close up of a tm logo on a metal surface.


While speaking with several clients filing trademark applications, there are common misconceptions about trademark rights that small business owners hold. The two most frequent misunderstandings are the belief that you do not have rights to your mark unless you file for a trademark and that filing for a trademark gives you an exclusive right to the mark. Both of these are somewhat true but include important misunderstandings that small business owners need to understand.


Myth #1:  My mark has no protection unless I file for a federal or state trademark. This is not true. The most basic way to gain the exclusive right to your mark is to use it in commerce (signs, labels on products, etc.) first in your industry and limited to the geographic area of your use. Just the act of using the mark gives your business a “common law” right to use that mark exclusively. Note that you must be the first to use it, and your exclusive is only within your industry. For example, you could open an auto body shop called “McDonalds” right next to a fast-food restaurant by the same name and still have that name protected as a common law trademark. Why? Because you were the first to use it in your industry. In trademark law, we refer to this test as a “likelihood of confusion.” Even though your name is identical to the fast-food restaurant next door, there is no likelihood that consumers would think you are operating as a fast-food burger restaurant.


Myth #2:  Filing for a state or federal trademark guarantees protection of my mark. This is also not true. Registering a trademark creates a presumption that you are the exclusive owner of the mark. But if another business can prove that they were using the mark first (and that there is a likelihood of confusion), you could be barred from using the mark. However, as noted in more detail below, the original user would have the duty to prove that their rights are senior to yours. The court will assume you are the exclusive owner unless someone else can prove otherwise. But it is important to note that someone might do just that.


So on the one hand you can obtain trademark rights without filing a trademark application. And on the other hand, you do not have a guarantee of rights if you do file. So why on earth do businesses spend the money to register trademarks? Trademarks are a great way to market your goods or services. They indicate to consumers the source of the goods or services. If your business is better than your competitors, and consumers know that, then a trademark will make you stand out.


In addition, as noted above, the filing creates the presumption that you are the exclusive owner. If anyone else is using the mark, you can issue a cease and desist letter or file suit and it is up to them to prove they have rights superior to yours. This is an important advantage because having the burden of proof in a legal matter can be expensive. The registration certificate proves ownership and eliminates the need for extensive evidence, leaving the opponent to bear the cost and burden of building and presenting their case. 


Moreover, registering a trademark is a good deterrent to prevent another party from using your mark. Searching the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s website for a registered trademark is easy, free, and fairly quick. Before beginning to use a mark, it is common for small businesses to search this database to see if there is a chance that they will be infringing upon someone else’s mark. As noted above, you’ll have rights to your mark and might even win if someone infringes on those rights even if you do not obtain registration of your trademark. But registering your mark might prevent that legal battle in the first place. Lastly, should you be forced to litigate to defend your rights, registration will enable you to recover your attorney fees in such a lawsuit. Such right creates leverages and puts you in a better legal position.



Trademark filings can be challenging and there are several pitfalls to be avoided. If you have a particular name, phrase, or image that you would like to protect from infringement, contact me at 847-705-7555 or tmcginn@lavellelaw.com to discuss the process and resources needed to protect your company’s marks by filing for a state or federal trademark.

More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

FinCEN Eliminates BOI Reporting Obligations!
By Frank P. Portera March 25, 2025
On March 21, 2025, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued its interim final rule stating that those entities previously classified as "domestic reporting companies" are now exempt from all BOI reporting requirements. On the other hand, all foreign entities registered to do business in the USA must file their own initial BOI reports within 30 days of the initial final rule's publication, if they have not done so already.
Join us April 3, 2025 for Business After Hours 5-7 PM
By Lavelle Law March 19, 2025
Spring is here, and with baseball season kicking off, we’re stepping up to the plate with our annual Lavelle Law Business After Hours event. We’re excited to partner with our friends in the Schaumburg business community for an evening of networking, good vibes, and a few surprises—all hosted in the friendly confines of our Schaumburg office. Bonus points: Feel free to rock your favorite baseball team’s gear and show off your fandom while you’re at it!
Delaware Court  Provides the Standard of Supreme Review for the Redomestication of Corporations
By Steven A. Migala and Anthony Letto March 12, 2025
Delaware corporations seeking to redomesticate to another state should be advised that on February 4, 2025, the Delaware Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Palkon v. Maffei, C.A. No. 2023-0449-JTL, addressing a challenge to TripAdvisor's redomestication from a Delaware corporation to a Nevada corporation. The case raised important questions regarding the standard of review applicable to such reincorporations, particularly when fiduciaries may derive a benefit from shifting to a legal regime perceived as more friendly.
Illinois residential zoning laws and significant opportunities for property owners.
By Chance W. Badertscher March 12, 2025
Recent legislative efforts in Illinois are reshaping the state’s approach to residential zoning, with significant implications for the housing market. A new bill, House Bill 1814, introduced last week, aims to eliminate single-family zoning in municipalities across Illinois. If passed, this bill will allow for the development of multi-unit buildings in areas currently zoned exclusively for single-family homes. This initiative, alongside a similar bill introduced last year, has the potential to address the state’s growing housing shortage and make housing more affordable for middle-class families.
LATEST UPDATE on the Corporate Transparency Act and BOI Report Filings
By Frank J. Portera and James Berg March 11, 2025
On February 27, 2025, FinCEN issued an immediate press release stating it would not impose fines, penalties, or take any other enforcement actions against companies that fail to file or update Beneficial Ownership Information ("BOI") reports pursuant to the Corporate Transparency Act ("CTA") by the current deadlines. FinCEN also announced that it would be revising BOI reporting deadlines through an interim final rule set to be issued no later than March 21, 2025.
IRS Releases its List of Dirty Dozen Tax Scams for 2025
By Timothy M. Hughes March 10, 2025
The IRS recently published its yearly list of most prevalent tax scams known as its Dirty Dozen. The list is obviously not exhaustive but an attempt to warn taxpayers of trends seen by the IRS. The IRS list of tax scams for 2025 came with a warning for taxpayers, businesses, and tax professionals to watch out for common schemes that threaten their tax and financial information.
Success Story – Small Business Owner Recovers Substantial Amount Levied by the State
By Tax Law March 5, 2025
Lavelle Law represented a small Illinois business owner who had accumulated a large sales tax balance due to their accountant’s negligence. Unbeknownst to the client Illinois Department of Revenue (“IDOR”) was at the levy issuance phase in its collection. And the IDOR levied the taxpayer’s account right after the taxpayer had deposited funds from a HELOC that was obtained to provide capital to the company for the next 6 plus months.
New statutory provisions on potential income included in new Illinois child support law.
By Joseph A. Olszowka February 27, 2025
The Illinois legislature has recently taken a significant step in closing a longstanding loophole in child support. This amendment represents a pivotal change in how courts assess and calculate child support obligations, providing greater protections against those who attempt to evade their financial responsibilities.
LATEST UPDATE on the Corporate Transparency Act and New Deadline for Filing BOIR
By Frank J. Portera February 20, 2025
This article will serve as another update to the ongoing Corporate Transparency Act developments. As of February 17, 2025, a federal judge in the Eastern District of Texas lifted the injunction it had ordered on January 7, 2025, in Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, 6:24-cv-00336 (E.D. Tex.), allowing the federal government to once again enforce the Corporate Transparency Act and its Beneficial Ownership Information Report requirements.
A Step-by-Step Guide to Bringing a Lawsuit in Illinois
By Sarah J. Reusché February 14, 2025
This article is the second in our Litigation 101 series. It focuses on the flip side: how to sue someone else. Suing someone is a serious decision that requires careful thought and preparation. Before pursuing legal action, it’s crucial to reflect on the issue and understand the steps involved in bringing a lawsuit. This article outlines the basics to help you approach the process with confidence and make informed decisions.
More Posts
Share by: