CHICAGO: 312 332 7555 SCHAUMBURG: 847 705 7555
Blog Post
Recorded Statement? – No Thank You!
Nicholas S. Dollenmaier • June 3, 2020
A lot of times after a person has been involved in a car crash, the at fault party’s insurance company gives them a call, sometimes hours after the collision, and asks for a recorded statement. Hardly ever is giving a recorded statement beneficial for the injured person and more often than not it can hurt his/her chances at recovery.
Unfortunately, most people do not see the harm in providing a recorded statement. Most believe that they were not at fault for the accident, were hurt from the accident, and the insurance company will make them “whole” after the accident if they agree to provide the recorded statement. Regrettably, this is not the case and instead of using that recorded statement to make the injured party whole, the insurance company uses it to discredit and sometimes take out of context a person’s words. This is especially true when the insurance company calls hours after the collision. When there is such proximity from the accident to the call, a person cannot be sure that they fully understand the extent of his/her injuries and should not be giving a detailed depiction of the collision itself. There is a good chance that hours after an accident, a person has not had the chance to fully digest the collision, what happened, may be experiencing the symptoms of shock, and are not able to fully realize their situation or their injuries.
This is why we always advise people who are on the fence about retaining a personal injury attorney to not provide a recorded statement until they make their decision. After we are retained, we are able to exert some control over the questions asked, format the conversation, and are able to take independent notes of what was said. Without us being there, the insurance company is able to retain the recording and independently assess how the conversation went. Absent filing a lawsuit, the insurance company is under no obligation to produce the recorded statement to the injured party.
Unfortunately, the insurance company is aware that having an attorney on the line can be beneficial to a person’s case, which is why the call to obtain the recorded statement can come hours after the accident. If you are in this situation, politely refuse to give the recorded statement and make the decision whether you are going to hire a personal injury attorney early. We are here to help. Not only by guiding you through the recorded statement process, if we determine it beneficial to provide, but also ensuring you the most recovery for your case. There are many mistakes that can be made early on in a personal injury situation that can limit your recovery and with our experience; we can help you avoid those.
In short, if you were involved in an accident and the insurance company asks for a recorded statement, politely say no thank you and think about whether you want to hire an attorney before returning the call.
If you have been injured in an automobile accident or as a result of someone’s negligence, please contact attorney Nicholas Dollenmaier at 847-705-7555 or via email at ndollenmaier@lavellelaw.com
to discuss your case and help get the compensation you deserve.
More News & Resources
Lavelle Law News and Events
This article will serve as another update to the ongoing Corporate Transparency Act developments. As of February 17, 2025, a federal judge in the Eastern District of Texas lifted the injunction it had ordered on January 7, 2025, in Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, 6:24-cv-00336 (E.D. Tex.), allowing the federal government to once again enforce the Corporate Transparency Act and its Beneficial Ownership Information Report requirements.
This article is the second in our Litigation 101 series. It focuses on the flip side: how to sue someone else.
Suing someone is a serious decision that requires careful thought and preparation. Before pursuing legal action, it’s crucial to reflect on the issue and understand the steps involved in bringing a lawsuit. This article outlines the basics to help you approach the process with confidence and make informed decisions.
On December 11, 2024, we published an article titled “Corporate Transparency Act on Hold: Key Implications for Businesses,” which addressed the nationwide injunction impacting the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act and its Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting rule.
Since then, there have been a few significant legal developments that businesses should monitor closely. While the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network is currently prohibited from enforcing BOIR requirements, ongoing litigation, and the related appeals may alter this status. Below, we provide a timeline of key events and insights into what business owners should anticipate moving forward.
The Internal Revenue Service is issuing automatic payments to eligible people who did not claim a Recovery Rebate Credit on their 2021 tax returns. The payments are in follow up to an IRS announcement last month of the intent to take this special step. The IRS took this step after reviewing internal data showing many eligible taxpayers who filed a return but did not claim the credit. The Recovery Rebate Credit is a refundable credit for individuals who did not receive one or more Economic Impact Payments (“EIP”), also known as stimulus payments.
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) establishes federal minimum wage and overtime pay requirements, with exemptions for employees in bona fide executive, administrative, professional, computer or outside sales roles. 29 U.S.C. § 213. Employees classified as "outside sales" must primarily engage in making sales or obtaining contracts for services or the use of facilities, and they must conduct their work primarily away from their employer’s place of business. 29 C.F.R. § 541.500.
Amendments to BIPA
SB 2929 became effective on August 2, 2024. Codified as 740 ILCS 14/10 and 14/20, this Act introduced two pivotal changes to BIPA that dealers should be aware of:
• Limiting Per-Scan Damages: The amendments clarify that a single violation under BIPA accrues per type of violation, rather than per scan. This significantly reduces the financial exposure for dealerships.
• Electronic Consent: The amendments formalize electronic signatures as a valid means of securing biometric consent, streamlining compliance processes for businesses.
The National Taxpayer Advocate recently released her annual report to Congress. A few highlights from the report are summarized in this article.
Nearly 300 New Illinois Laws are going into effect in 2025. Listed below are some that may have a significant impact on you or your business.
As we say farewell to 2024, we’re excited to look back on the unforgettable moments from our Koozie Challenge! From the frozen wonders of Antarctica to the excitement of the Paris Olympics, and countless incredible destinations in between, the Lavelle Law koozie truly went the distance this year! A big thank you to our clients, staff, family, and friends who took part in the fun. Here’s to even more adventures in 2025! Happy New Year from Lavelle Law!
Schaumburg-based Lavelle Law wrapped its annual food drive benefiting the Schaumburg Township Food Pantry. During the month of October, Lavelle Law set up collection boxes around Schaumburg and the surrounding area, where residents and workers could drop off nonperishable food items, paper goods, personal care items, baby food and diapers. Participants could also make cash donations online.
STAY UP TO DATE
Subscribe to our newsletter
OUR LOCATIONS
Phone: 312 332 7555
Fax: 312 332 4611
Fax: 847 705 9960
Created by Olive + Ash.
Managed by Olive Street Design. 