Recorded Statement? – No Thank You!
Nicholas S. Dollenmaier • June 3, 2020
A lot of times after a person has been involved in a car crash, the at fault party’s insurance company gives them a call, sometimes hours after the collision, and asks for a recorded statement. Hardly ever is giving a recorded statement beneficial for the injured person and more often than not it can hurt his/her chances at recovery.
Unfortunately, most people do not see the harm in providing a recorded statement. Most believe that they were not at fault for the accident, were hurt from the accident, and the insurance company will make them “whole” after the accident if they agree to provide the recorded statement. Regrettably, this is not the case and instead of using that recorded statement to make the injured party whole, the insurance company uses it to discredit and sometimes take out of context a person’s words. This is especially true when the insurance company calls hours after the collision. When there is such proximity from the accident to the call, a person cannot be sure that they fully understand the extent of his/her injuries and should not be giving a detailed depiction of the collision itself. There is a good chance that hours after an accident, a person has not had the chance to fully digest the collision, what happened, may be experiencing the symptoms of shock, and are not able to fully realize their situation or their injuries.
This is why we always advise people who are on the fence about retaining a personal injury attorney to not provide a recorded statement until they make their decision. After we are retained, we are able to exert some control over the questions asked, format the conversation, and are able to take independent notes of what was said. Without us being there, the insurance company is able to retain the recording and independently assess how the conversation went. Absent filing a lawsuit, the insurance company is under no obligation to produce the recorded statement to the injured party.
Unfortunately, the insurance company is aware that having an attorney on the line can be beneficial to a person’s case, which is why the call to obtain the recorded statement can come hours after the accident. If you are in this situation, politely refuse to give the recorded statement and make the decision whether you are going to hire a personal injury attorney early. We are here to help. Not only by guiding you through the recorded statement process, if we determine it beneficial to provide, but also ensuring you the most recovery for your case. There are many mistakes that can be made early on in a personal injury situation that can limit your recovery and with our experience; we can help you avoid those.
In short, if you were involved in an accident and the insurance company asks for a recorded statement, politely say no thank you and think about whether you want to hire an attorney before returning the call.
If you have been injured in an automobile accident or as a result of someone’s negligence, please contact attorney Nicholas Dollenmaier at 847-705-7555 or via email at ndollenmaier@lavellelaw.com
to discuss your case and help get the compensation you deserve.
More News & Resources
Lavelle Law News and Events
Lavelle Law represented a joint venture in its $9.9 million acquisition of four multi-unit buildings.
A Type F reorganization (“F Reorg”), governed by Section 368(a)(1)(F) of the Internal Revenue Code, provides a strategically significant mechanism for corporate restructuring. Defined as a “mere change in identity, form, or place of organization of one corporation,” an F Reorg permits a corporation to alter its legal existence while being treated for federal tax purposes as the same entity. This recharacterization allows for the uninterrupted preservation of tax attributes while maintaining shareholder continuity.
When it comes to estate planning, most people think about providing for their loved ones—but what about the furry, feathered, or scaled members of your family? In the United States, 68% of households own at least one pet, according to the American Pet Products Association’s 2023-2024 National Pet Owners Survey. For many, pets are more than just companions—they’re family. Ensuring their care after your death or incapacity is a vital part of comprehensive estate planning. In Illinois, a Pet Trust offers a powerful solution to guarantee your pet’s well-being long after you’re gone.
IRS Press Release Addresses Payment Plan Options - A recent press release by the IRS addressed the options that are available to taxpayers who may owe more on April 15th than they can pay. The IRS advised taxpayers that they do not need to wait until April 15 to file their 2024 federal return, and if they owe and are unable to pay the balance in full, there are payment plans available to help them pay their tax obligation.
Join us on May 21 in Schaumburg for an engaging Breakfast Briefs seminar, delving into vital strategies to fortify your business. This session will explore the critical role of crafting ironclad non-compete agreements, shielding your trade secrets, and mastering the nuances of temporary restraining orders (TROs) and injunctive relief. Our presenters, attorneys Matthew Sheahin and Jennifer Tee, bring a wealth of experience in this legal domain. Seize this chance to bolster your company’s legal protections and lay a solid groundwork for enduring success!
On March 21, 2025, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued its interim final rule stating that those entities previously classified as "domestic reporting companies" are now exempt from all BOI reporting requirements. On the other hand, all foreign entities registered to do business in the USA must file their own initial BOI reports within 30 days of the initial final rule's publication, if they have not done so already.
Spring is here, and with baseball season kicking off, we’re stepping up to the plate with our annual Lavelle Law Business After Hours event. We’re excited to partner with our friends in the Schaumburg business community for an evening of networking, good vibes, and a few surprises—all hosted in the friendly confines of our Schaumburg office. Bonus points: Feel free to rock your favorite baseball team’s gear and show off your fandom while you’re at it!
Delaware corporations seeking to redomesticate to another state should be advised that on February 4, 2025, the Delaware Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Palkon v. Maffei, C.A. No. 2023-0449-JTL, addressing a challenge to TripAdvisor's redomestication from a Delaware corporation to a Nevada corporation. The case raised important questions regarding the standard of review applicable to such reincorporations, particularly when fiduciaries may derive a benefit from shifting to a legal regime perceived as more friendly.
Recent legislative efforts in Illinois are reshaping the state’s approach to residential zoning, with significant implications for the housing market. A new bill, House Bill 1814, introduced last week, aims to eliminate single-family zoning in municipalities across Illinois. If passed, this bill will allow for the development of multi-unit buildings in areas currently zoned exclusively for single-family homes. This initiative, alongside a similar bill introduced last year, has the potential to address the state’s growing housing shortage and make housing more affordable for middle-class families.
On February 27, 2025, FinCEN issued an immediate press release stating it would not impose fines, penalties, or take any other enforcement actions against companies that fail to file or update Beneficial Ownership Information ("BOI") reports pursuant to the Corporate Transparency Act ("CTA") by the current deadlines. FinCEN also announced that it would be revising BOI reporting deadlines through an interim final rule set to be issued no later than March 21, 2025.
