Blog Post

BIPA Compliance: A Guide for Vehicle Dealerships to Mitigate Litigation Risks

Sarah J. Reusche and Nathan Toy • April 30, 2024
A person is pressing a button on a virtual screen.

In this era of technological innovation, the adoption of biometric data for various applications in the workplace has surged. From fingerprint scans for timekeeping to facial recognition for access control, biometric technology has become a key aspect of modern business operations. However, this integration has also raised privacy and security concerns, leading to legislative responses aimed at protecting individuals' biometric information. At the forefront of this is the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”). 


Vehicle dealerships particularly have recently found themselves needing to navigate the complex terrain of adhering to the BIPA’s stringent requirements to avoid being targeted through lawsuits. There has been a recent noticeable uptick in class action lawsuits under the BIPA, serving as a critical wake-up call for the automotive retail industry, highlighting the need for dealerships to review and enhance their practices if they are using biometric technology. 


Class Action Suits Under the BIPA


BIPA class action lawsuits have targeted employers who use biometric systems to track workers’ paid hours or to control access to secured or sensitive areas in a workplace. An example of this can be seen in this class action lawsuit filed in September of 2023, in which a Chicago area car dealership was accused of violating the BIPA by requiring workers to access a secure vehicle key box at the dealership. Along with granting the employee access to a key, the system created audit trails to identify the employees, and the employees’ biometric information was enrolled and retained in the dealership’s database and cloud system. 


The suit noted that this could expose employees to serious and irreversible privacy risks due to the potential danger of the database being breached, and the employees having no means by which to prevent identity theft and unauthorized tracking. The Plaintiffs also allege that the Defendants violated the BIPA by not properly informing employees of the collection and storage, not providing a publicly available retention schedule and guidelines for the destruction of the fingerprint information, and not obtaining a written release from the employees authorizing the collection and storage of their biometric information. Another example of biometric system usage that could result in such a lawsuit is collecting and storing employee fingerprints for timekeeping purposes. 


How Dealers Can Protect Themselves 


The most effective way for a vehicle dealership to protect themselves is to ensure compliance by being aware of the following issues: 


What disclosures are being made? The BIPA requires a written notice explaining that biometric information will be collected, the purpose for doing so, and the length of time the information will be retained. Creating a clear company policy concerning the collection, use, retention, and security of biometric information will, if done properly and provided to employees, satisfy notice requirements and may also help ease some concerns from employees.


Is a written release being obtained? In addition to providing notice, a “written release” must be obtained prior to collecting and storing an individual’s biometric information to serve as written consent. 


Is there a written policy for retention and deletion? If a company collects or stores biometric data, then it must have a written policy for handling such data. This written policy must include a retention schedule and guidelines for permanently destroying the data when required. 


Enforcement 


The BIPA carries a private right of action for harmed individuals and includes statutory damages of $1,000 per negligent violation and $5,000 per intentional violation, or actual damages, whichever is greater. Additionally, successful plaintiffs may receive reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, and courts can issue an injunction to order the offending party to change their practices to comply with the Act’s requirements. 


Given these harsh penalties and the risk of non-compliance, dealers should contact legal counsel for advice on how to best navigate the BIPA. For further inquiries or questions, please contact attorney Sarah Reusche at sreusche@lavellelaw.com or (847) 705-7555. 


More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

LATEST UPDATE on the Corporate Transparency Act and New Deadline for Filing BOIR
By Frank J. Portera February 20, 2025
This article will serve as another update to the ongoing Corporate Transparency Act developments. As of February 17, 2025, a federal judge in the Eastern District of Texas lifted the injunction it had ordered on January 7, 2025, in Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, 6:24-cv-00336 (E.D. Tex.), allowing the federal government to once again enforce the Corporate Transparency Act and its Beneficial Ownership Information Report requirements.
A Step-by-Step Guide to Bringing a Lawsuit in Illinois
By Sarah J. Reusché February 14, 2025
This article is the second in our Litigation 101 series. It focuses on the flip side: how to sue someone else. Suing someone is a serious decision that requires careful thought and preparation. Before pursuing legal action, it’s crucial to reflect on the issue and understand the steps involved in bringing a lawsuit. This article outlines the basics to help you approach the process with confidence and make informed decisions.
Updates Regarding the Corporate Transparency Act Hold: Key Implications for Businesses
By Frank J. Portera February 13, 2025
On December 11, 2024, we published an article titled “Corporate Transparency Act on Hold: Key Implications for Businesses,” which addressed the nationwide injunction impacting the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act and its Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting rule. Since then, there have been a few significant legal developments that businesses should monitor closely. While the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network is currently prohibited from enforcing BOIR requirements, ongoing litigation, and the related appeals may alter this status. Below, we provide a timeline of key events and insights into what business owners should anticipate moving forward.
IRS Special Payments Sent to 1 Million Taxpayers Who Did Not Claim 2021 Recovery Rebate Credit
By Timothy M. Hughes February 10, 2025
The Internal Revenue Service is issuing automatic payments to eligible people who did not claim a Recovery Rebate Credit on their 2021 tax returns. The payments are in follow up to an IRS announcement last month of the intent to take this special step. The IRS took this step after reviewing internal data showing many eligible taxpayers who filed a return but did not claim the credit. The Recovery Rebate Credit is a refundable credit for individuals who did not receive one or more Economic Impact Payments (“EIP”), also known as stimulus payments.
SCOTUS Resolves Circuit Split on FLSA Exemption Standard
By Steven A. Migala February 5, 2025
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) establishes federal minimum wage and overtime pay requirements, with exemptions for employees in bona fide executive, administrative, professional, computer or outside sales roles. 29 U.S.C. § 213. Employees classified as "outside sales" must primarily engage in making sales or obtaining contracts for services or the use of facilities, and they must conduct their work primarily away from their employer’s place of business. 29 C.F.R. § 541.500.
Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA)
By Sarah J. Reusché January 23, 2025
Amendments to BIPA SB 2929 became effective on August 2, 2024. Codified as 740 ILCS 14/10 and 14/20, this Act introduced two pivotal changes to BIPA that dealers should be aware of: • Limiting Per-Scan Damages: The amendments clarify that a single violation under BIPA accrues per type of violation, rather than per scan. This significantly reduces the financial exposure for dealerships. • Electronic Consent: The amendments formalize electronic signatures as a valid means of securing biometric consent, streamlining compliance processes for businesses.
IRS National Taxpayer Advocate Releases Annual Report to Congress. And in an Unrelated Matter DOJ Ta
By Timothy M. Hughes January 10, 2025
The National Taxpayer Advocate recently released her annual report to Congress. A few highlights from the report are summarized in this article.
Nearly 300 New Illinois Laws are going into effect in 2025.
By Lavelle Law January 8, 2025
Nearly 300 New Illinois Laws are going into effect in 2025. Listed below are some that may have a significant impact on you or your business.
Happy New Year and Cheers to New Adventures in 2025!
By Lavelle Law December 31, 2024
As we say farewell to 2024, we’re excited to look back on the unforgettable moments from our Koozie Challenge! From the frozen wonders of Antarctica to the excitement of the Paris Olympics, and countless incredible destinations in between, the Lavelle Law koozie truly went the distance this year! A big thank you to our clients, staff, family, and friends who took part in the fun. Here’s to even more adventures in 2025! Happy New Year from Lavelle Law!
Lavelle Law concludes the 2024 annual food drive.
By Lavelle Law December 30, 2024
Schaumburg-based Lavelle Law wrapped its annual food drive benefiting the Schaumburg Township Food Pantry. During the month of October, Lavelle Law set up collection boxes around Schaumburg and the surrounding area, where residents and workers could drop off nonperishable food items, paper goods, personal care items, baby food and diapers. Participants could also make cash donations online.
More Posts
Share by: