Blog Post

Banking and Business Monthly – September 2020

Steven A. Migala • September 14, 2020
SEC EXPANDS DEFINITIONS of “ACCREDITED INVESTOR” and “QUALIFIED INSTITUTIONAL BUYER”

On August 26, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued a final rule, adopting amendments to expand the definitions of “accredited investor” and “qualified institutional buyer.” Previously, the requirements for an individual to be considered an accredited investor were based on wealth or income tests. The new amendment modernized this classification, allowing individuals to qualify as accredited investors based on knowledge and expertise. In an explanation of this amendment, SEC Chairman Jay Clayton stated that investors who “do not meet the wealth tests, but who clearly are financially sophisticated enough to understand the risks” in exempt offerings should be able to qualify as accredited investors.

Accredited Investor

The SEC retains the ability to designate which professional certifications or credentials would qualify a person as an accredited investor. Currently, the SEC has designated that holders of Series 7, Series 65, and Series 82 licenses could qualify as accredited investors. These requirements can change over time as the SEC deems appropriate under this new amendment. The SEC has made these changes because it believes that “relying solely on financial thresholds as an indication of financial sophistication is suboptimal” and that doing so could unduly restrict access to investment opportunities by persons who have the knowledge and expertise to understand the risks and merits of prospective investments. In addition to expanding the requirements for individuals, this amendment also adds a “spousal equivalent” classification. This allows individuals who are “spousal equivalents” to pool their resources in order to qualify as accredited investors.

This newly expanded definition of an accredited investor also includes individuals who qualify as “knowledgeable employees.” Knowledgeable employees are defined in the Investment Companies Act of 1940 as (1) directors, officers, trustees, general partners, advisory board members or persons serving in a similar capacity of a private fund or an affiliated management person, or (2) an employee or affiliated management person of a private fund whose regular functions or duties include participating in the investment activities of a private fund or investment company. The investment activities must have been a function of said employee for at least 12 months for him or her to qualify as a knowledgeable employee.

The amendment also adds a new qualification category for entities, as long as they were not formed for the specific purpose of investing in the securities offered, and provided they own “investments,” as defined in Rule2a51-1(b) of the Investment Company Act, totaling at least $5 million. This category includes, but is not limited to, entities such as limited liability companies, Indian tribes, governmental bodies, funds, and entities organized under laws of foreign countries.

The amendment adds another new category to the accredited investor definition for “family offices” as defined in Section 275.202(a)(11)(G)-1 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. A family office can qualify as an accredited investor if; (1) it has least $5 million in assets, (2) it is not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring the securities offered, and (3) its prospective investment is directed by a person who has the knowledge and expertise required to competently evaluate the risks and merits of the prospective investment. The amendment includes in this category “family clients” of family offices that meet the above requirements and whose prospective investment in the issuer is directed by the family office.

Qualified Institutional Buyer

In conjunction with expanding the definition of an accredited investor, the amendment also expands the definition of a qualified institutional buyer. The expanded definition includes limited liability companies and rural business investment companies that have $100 million in securities owned and invested. It also includes institutions that qualify as accredited investors and meet this $100 million ownership and investment threshold, even if they are not specifically enumerated in the definition of a qualified institutional buyer.

Conclusion

These amended definitions signal that the SEC is modernizing its rules. The SEC has admitted that, despite these new definitions, it does not expect to see a significant increase in individuals who now qualify as accredited investors but who otherwise would not. Critics of the SEC argue that these amendments are not expansive enough to make a real difference and that the SEC should have made the newly amended definitions even broader. Regardless of the speculated impact of these changes, it will be critical for both prospective individual and institutional investors to understand the amendments and monitor the SEC for any future modifications. The amendments will go into effect 60 days after their publication in the Federal Register. 

If you have any questions about this article, please contact Steve at smigala@lavellelaw.com or 847-705-7555.

More News & Resources

Lavelle Law News and Events

LATEST UPDATE on the Corporate Transparency Act and New Deadline for Filing BOIR
By Frank J. Portera February 20, 2025
This article will serve as another update to the ongoing Corporate Transparency Act developments. As of February 17, 2025, a federal judge in the Eastern District of Texas lifted the injunction it had ordered on January 7, 2025, in Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, 6:24-cv-00336 (E.D. Tex.), allowing the federal government to once again enforce the Corporate Transparency Act and its Beneficial Ownership Information Report requirements.
A Step-by-Step Guide to Bringing a Lawsuit in Illinois
By Sarah J. Reusché February 14, 2025
This article is the second in our Litigation 101 series. It focuses on the flip side: how to sue someone else. Suing someone is a serious decision that requires careful thought and preparation. Before pursuing legal action, it’s crucial to reflect on the issue and understand the steps involved in bringing a lawsuit. This article outlines the basics to help you approach the process with confidence and make informed decisions.
Updates Regarding the Corporate Transparency Act Hold: Key Implications for Businesses
By Frank J. Portera February 13, 2025
On December 11, 2024, we published an article titled “Corporate Transparency Act on Hold: Key Implications for Businesses,” which addressed the nationwide injunction impacting the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act and its Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting rule. Since then, there have been a few significant legal developments that businesses should monitor closely. While the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network is currently prohibited from enforcing BOIR requirements, ongoing litigation, and the related appeals may alter this status. Below, we provide a timeline of key events and insights into what business owners should anticipate moving forward.
IRS Special Payments Sent to 1 Million Taxpayers Who Did Not Claim 2021 Recovery Rebate Credit
By Timothy M. Hughes February 10, 2025
The Internal Revenue Service is issuing automatic payments to eligible people who did not claim a Recovery Rebate Credit on their 2021 tax returns. The payments are in follow up to an IRS announcement last month of the intent to take this special step. The IRS took this step after reviewing internal data showing many eligible taxpayers who filed a return but did not claim the credit. The Recovery Rebate Credit is a refundable credit for individuals who did not receive one or more Economic Impact Payments (“EIP”), also known as stimulus payments.
SCOTUS Resolves Circuit Split on FLSA Exemption Standard
By Steven A. Migala February 5, 2025
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) establishes federal minimum wage and overtime pay requirements, with exemptions for employees in bona fide executive, administrative, professional, computer or outside sales roles. 29 U.S.C. § 213. Employees classified as "outside sales" must primarily engage in making sales or obtaining contracts for services or the use of facilities, and they must conduct their work primarily away from their employer’s place of business. 29 C.F.R. § 541.500.
Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA)
By Sarah J. Reusché January 23, 2025
Amendments to BIPA SB 2929 became effective on August 2, 2024. Codified as 740 ILCS 14/10 and 14/20, this Act introduced two pivotal changes to BIPA that dealers should be aware of: • Limiting Per-Scan Damages: The amendments clarify that a single violation under BIPA accrues per type of violation, rather than per scan. This significantly reduces the financial exposure for dealerships. • Electronic Consent: The amendments formalize electronic signatures as a valid means of securing biometric consent, streamlining compliance processes for businesses.
IRS National Taxpayer Advocate Releases Annual Report to Congress. And in an Unrelated Matter DOJ Ta
By Timothy M. Hughes January 10, 2025
The National Taxpayer Advocate recently released her annual report to Congress. A few highlights from the report are summarized in this article.
Nearly 300 New Illinois Laws are going into effect in 2025.
By Lavelle Law January 8, 2025
Nearly 300 New Illinois Laws are going into effect in 2025. Listed below are some that may have a significant impact on you or your business.
Happy New Year and Cheers to New Adventures in 2025!
By Lavelle Law December 31, 2024
As we say farewell to 2024, we’re excited to look back on the unforgettable moments from our Koozie Challenge! From the frozen wonders of Antarctica to the excitement of the Paris Olympics, and countless incredible destinations in between, the Lavelle Law koozie truly went the distance this year! A big thank you to our clients, staff, family, and friends who took part in the fun. Here’s to even more adventures in 2025! Happy New Year from Lavelle Law!
Lavelle Law concludes the 2024 annual food drive.
By Lavelle Law December 30, 2024
Schaumburg-based Lavelle Law wrapped its annual food drive benefiting the Schaumburg Township Food Pantry. During the month of October, Lavelle Law set up collection boxes around Schaumburg and the surrounding area, where residents and workers could drop off nonperishable food items, paper goods, personal care items, baby food and diapers. Participants could also make cash donations online.
More Posts
Share by: